David M. Lyth

619 citations
17 papers · 417 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David M. Lyth

17 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

David M. Lyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 191
  • Management Information Systems 134
  • Marketing 91
  • Strategy and Management 110
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 11
Replace Julie M. Hays with:
Julie M. Hays United States
Hsi-Tien Chen Taiwan
Blair J. Berkley United States
Hsiu‐Yuan Hu Taiwan
Jari Juga Finland
Tom Tan United States
Jamil Hamali Malaysia
K. Koelemeijer Netherlands
Rafael Periáñez Cristóbal Spain
Javier Merino Díaz de Cerio Spain
David M. Lyth relative to Julie M. Hays United States Julie M. Hays's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Julie M. Hays · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Lyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Lyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Lyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Lyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Lyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Lyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Lyth. The network helps show where David M. Lyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside David M. Lyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David M. Lyth Line = papers co-authored together David M. Lyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1990153
2 200352
3 199752
4 200328
5 199226
6 199221
7 200817
8 202011
9 201311
10 198910
11 19959
12 19958
13 20056
14
EVALUATING A NEW KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TOOL
20084
15 20144
16 20093
17 20182

About David M. Lyth

David M. Lyth is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers), Quality and Management Systems (3 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (2 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (191 citations), Management Information Systems (134 citations), Marketing (91 citations), Strategy and Management (110 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (11 citations). David M. Lyth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Linda M. Delene, Larry A. Mallak, Robert Landeros and Robert Reck. Their work appears in journals such as Quality Engineering, Engineering Management Journal, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education and International Journal of Service Industry Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact