Natalie I. Berger
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Brooke IngersollKatherine PickardAllison WainerDonna CochBree HoltzKatherine E. ShannonLisa V. IbañezAlice S. Carter
- Topics
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (15 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersPsychophysiologyJournal of Medical Internet Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Natalie I. Berger
17 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Cognitive Neuroscience 413
- Clinical Psychology 388
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 139
- Education 133
- Psychiatry and Mental health 115
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie I. Berger
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie I. Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie I. Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie I. Berger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie I. Berger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie I. Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie I. Berger. The network helps show where Natalie I. Berger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie I. Berger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie I. Berger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie I. Berger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie I. Berger. Natalie I. Berger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 200 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 111 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 19 |
About Natalie I. Berger
Natalie I. Berger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (15 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (413 citations), Clinical Psychology (388 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (139 citations). Natalie I. Berger has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Brooke Ingersoll, Katherine Pickard, Allison Wainer, Donna Coch, Bree Holtz, Katherine E. Shannon, Lisa V. Ibañez, Alice S. Carter, Wendy L. Stone and Jocelyn Kuhn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Psychophysiology and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.