Rachel Forsyth
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- General Health Professions
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Claire HamshireA. Mark LanganKirsten JackW. E. HarrisKathryn SutherlandPeter FeltenMark StubbsAngel Chater
- Topics
- Higher Education Practises and Engagement (7 papers)Online and Blended Learning (5 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the Royal Society of MedicineHigher Education Research & Development
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rachel Forsyth
17 papers receiving 224 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Education 134
- Sociology and Political Science 39
- Political Science and International Relations 36
- General Health Professions 33
- Clinical Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Forsyth
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Forsyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Forsyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Forsyth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Forsyth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Forsyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Forsyth. The network helps show where Rachel Forsyth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Forsyth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Forsyth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Forsyth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Forsyth. Rachel Forsyth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | Designing interactive online learning environments | 0 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Rachel Forsyth
Rachel Forsyth is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Education and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Practises and Engagement (7 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (19 citations), Leadership and Management (7 citations) and Education (134 citations). Rachel Forsyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claire Hamshire, A. Mark Langan, Kirsten Jack, W. E. Harris, Kathryn Sutherland, Peter Felten, Mark Stubbs, Angel Chater, Robert Thomas and Róisín Kelly‐Laubscher. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Higher Education Research & Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.