Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The valuation of reliability for personal travel
2001645 citationsJohn Polak, Peter Jones et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Jones. The network helps show where Peter Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Jones. Peter Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jones, Peter, et al.. (2016). How do pedestrians balance safety, walking time, and the utility of crossing the road? A stated preference study. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Anciaes, Paulo & Peter Jones. (2015). The influence of motorised traffic on pedestrian flows and behaviour - new insights from bus stop data. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Jones, Peter, et al.. (2009). Has the Historical Growth in Car Use Come to an End in Great Britain. UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Peter. (2009). "COMMERCE DES LUMIÈRES": THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN TECHNOLOGY, 1763-1815. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 10. 67–82.1 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Peter, et al.. (2008). A comprehensive approach to planning and designing urban streets. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
Jones, Peter, et al.. (2003). 'Using public consultation as an imput to developing Edinburgh's congestion charging based transport strategy' Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Conference, Washington DC. January. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
14.
Allen, Julian, Stephen Anderson, Michael Browne, & Peter Jones. (2001). Urban Freight transport and logistics systems: moving towards sustainability. UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Peter, et al.. (1995). THE ROLE OF TELEMATICS IN CONTRIBUTING TO URBAN TRANSPORT POLICY OBJECTIVES. Built Environment. 21(4).1 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Peter. (1992). SOME RECENT METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR.. IATSS Research.3 indexed citations
17.
Jones, Peter & Andrew S. Skinner. (1992). Adam Smith reviewed. Edinburgh University Press eBooks.15 indexed citations
Jones, Peter. (1980). EXPERIENCE WITH HOUSEHOLD ACTIVITY-TRAVEL SIMULATOR (HATS). Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.8 indexed citations
20.
Jones, Peter. (1979). METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING TRANSPORTATION POLICY IMPACTS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.