Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Addiction to the Internet and Online Gaming
2005479 citationsPeter Hastings et al.CyberPsychology & Behaviorprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hastings
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hastings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hastings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hastings more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hastings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hastings. The network helps show where Peter Hastings may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Hastings
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Hastings.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Hastings based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Hastings. Peter Hastings is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hastings, Peter, et al.. (2005). Addiction to the Internet and Online Gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 8(2). 110–113.479 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Hastings, Peter. (2004). All parts are not created equal: SIAM-LSA. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).5 indexed citations
Hastings, Peter, et al.. (2001). Rules for Syntax, Vectors for Semantics. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).48 indexed citations
13.
Choi, Freddy Y. Y., Peter Hastings, & Johanna D. Moore. (2001). Latent Semantic Analysis for Text Segmentation. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh).133 indexed citations
14.
Hastings, Peter. (2000). Adding syntactic information to LSA. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 22(22).30 indexed citations
15.
Wiemer-Hastings, Katja & Peter Hastings. (2000). DP. 90–96.1 indexed citations
Hastings, Peter. (1999). How latent is latent semantic analysis. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 932–937.41 indexed citations
18.
Hastings, Peter, Katja Wiemer-Hastings, & Arthur C. Graesser. (1999). Approximate Natural Language Understanding for an Intelligent Tutor. The Florida AI Research Society. 192–196.13 indexed citations
19.
Graesser, Arthur C., et al.. (1998). Simulating Smooth Tutorial Dialogue with Pedagogical Value. The Florida AI Research Society. 163–167.7 indexed citations
20.
Hastings, Peter & Steven L. Lytinen. (1994). The ups and downs of lexical acquisition. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 754–759.27 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.