Applied Ergonomics

5.3k papers and 140.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.3k papers published in Applied Ergonomics in the last decades have received a total of 140.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Ergonomics usually cover Social Psychology (2.6k papers), Pharmacology (1.3k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (705 papers) specifically the topics of Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (1.6k papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1.3k papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (861 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Ergonomics are E.N. Corlett, Lynn McAtamney, Yvonne Rogers, Barry Kirwan, Neville A. Stanton, John R. Wilson, Pascale Carayon, Sue Hignett, Christine M. Haslegrave and Åsa Kilbom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Ergonomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Ergonomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Ergonomics.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Ergonomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Ergonomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Ergonomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Ergonomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025