Peter Booth

1.9k total citations
29 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Peter Booth is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Booth has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Management Information Systems, 11 papers in Accounting and 7 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Peter Booth's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers). Peter Booth is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers). Peter Booth collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Peter Booth's co-authors include Bernhard Wieder, Zoltan Matolcsy, Axel Schulz, Peter F. Luckett, Anthony A. Atkinson, Rosina Mladenovic, Maria‐Luise Ossimitz, Hume Winzar, David A. Brown and Prabhu Sivabalan and has published in prestigious journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Long Range Planning and Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal.

In The Last Decade

Peter Booth

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Booth Australia 17 672 504 311 187 169 29 1.3k
Gordon Boyce Australia 17 367 0.5× 661 1.3× 216 0.7× 376 2.0× 97 0.6× 60 1.3k
Fawzi Laswad New Zealand 18 340 0.5× 831 1.6× 261 0.8× 222 1.2× 79 0.5× 53 1.3k
Alan Coad United Kingdom 10 503 0.7× 204 0.4× 293 0.9× 58 0.3× 72 0.4× 15 908
Philomena Leung Australia 23 233 0.3× 737 1.5× 513 1.6× 87 0.5× 358 2.1× 51 1.5k
Steven J. Kachelmeier United States 27 363 0.5× 1.2k 2.4× 319 1.0× 41 0.2× 96 0.6× 59 2.1k
Theresa Libby Canada 17 632 0.9× 573 1.1× 303 1.0× 31 0.2× 160 0.9× 48 1.3k
Peter Oyelere New Zealand 15 224 0.3× 593 1.2× 174 0.6× 155 0.8× 89 0.5× 33 1.0k
Raymond S. Schmidgall United States 18 207 0.3× 241 0.5× 211 0.7× 47 0.3× 111 0.7× 120 1.1k
Vincent K. Chong Australia 16 800 1.2× 483 1.0× 486 1.6× 43 0.2× 166 1.0× 34 1.5k
Carolyn Stringer New Zealand 9 289 0.4× 194 0.4× 178 0.6× 91 0.5× 45 0.3× 19 733

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Booth. The network helps show where Peter Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Booth. Peter Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gudergan, Siegfried P., et al.. (2018). Interactive profit-planning systems and market turbulence: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Long Range Planning. 52(3). 386–405. 37 indexed citations
2.
Booth, Peter, et al.. (2009). Controlling International Joint Ventures: An Investigation of Australian Parent Partners. Australian Accounting Review. 19(2). 103–116. 5 indexed citations
3.
Sivabalan, Prabhu, Peter Booth, Teemu Malmi, & David A. Brown. (2009). An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget. Accounting and Finance. 49(4). 849–871. 58 indexed citations
4.
Cheng, Mandy M., Axel Schulz, & Peter Booth. (2008). Knowledge transfer in project reviews: the effect of self‐justification bias and moral hazard. Accounting and Finance. 49(1). 75–93. 10 indexed citations
5.
Wieder, Bernhard, Peter Booth, Zoltan Matolcsy, & Maria‐Luise Ossimitz. (2006). The impact of ERP systems on firm and business process performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 19(1). 13–29. 158 indexed citations
6.
Matolcsy, Zoltan, Peter Booth, & Bernhard Wieder. (2005). Economic benefits of enterprise resource planning systems: some empirical evidence. Accounting and Finance. 45(3). 439–456. 70 indexed citations
7.
Cheng, Mandy M., Axel Schulz, Peter F. Luckett, & Peter Booth. (2003). The Effects of Hurdle Rates on the Level of Escalation of Commitment in Capital Budgeting. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 15(1). 63–85. 43 indexed citations
8.
Booth, Peter & Axel Schulz. (2003). The impact of an ethical environment on managers' project evaluation judgments under agency problem conditions. Accounting Organizations and Society. 29(5-6). 473–488. 100 indexed citations
9.
Booth, Peter. (2001). Commentary on: Some thoughts on social and environmental accounting education. Accounting Education. 10(4). 357–359. 6 indexed citations
10.
Booth, Peter, Zoltan Matolcsy, & Bernhard Wieder. (2000). The Impacts of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems on Accounting Practice – The Australian Experience. Australian Accounting Review. 10(22). 4–18. 85 indexed citations
11.
Atkinson, Anthony A., et al.. (1997). New directions in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 9(9). 79–108. 208 indexed citations
12.
Schulz, Axel & Peter Booth. (1995). THE EFFECTS OF PRESENTATION FORMAT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF AUDITORS‘ ANALYTICAL REVIEW JUDGMENTS. Accounting and Finance. 35(1). 107–131. 21 indexed citations
13.
Booth, Peter. (1995). Management Control in a Voluntary Organization: Accounting and Accountants in Organizational Context. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12 indexed citations
14.
Booth, Peter. (1993). Accounting in Churches: A Research Framework and Agenda. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal. 6(4). 112 indexed citations
15.
Booth, Peter & Hume Winzar. (1993). PERSONALITY BIASES OF ACCOUNTING STUDENTS: SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR LEARNING STYLE PREFERENCES. Accounting and Finance. 33(2). 109–120. 57 indexed citations
16.
Booth, Peter. (1992). The Sacred and the Secular: The Variable Significance of Accounting in a Religious Organization. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1 indexed citations
17.
Booth, Peter, et al.. (1989). The economic importance of tourism and the arts in Merseyside. Journal of Cultural Economics. 13(2). 8 indexed citations
18.
Booth, Peter & Patrick Hutchinson. (1989). Distinguishing Between Failing and Growing Firms: A Note On the Use of Decomposition Measure Analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 16(2). 267–271. 8 indexed citations
19.
Booth, Peter. (1983). DECOMPOSITION MEASURES AND THE PREDICTION OF FINANCIAL FAILURE. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 10(1). 67–82. 31 indexed citations
20.
Goodchild, M. F. & Peter Booth. (1980). Location and allocation of recreation facilities: public swimming pools in London, Ontario.. 15(15). 35–51. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026