Long Range Planning

4.3k papers and 202.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Long Range Planning in the last decades have received a total of 202.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Long Range Planning usually cover Strategy and Management (1.2k papers), Accounting (436 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (427 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (646 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (341 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (307 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Long Range Planning are David J. Teece, Roger Bougie, Uma Sekaran, Samuel P. Huntington, David Storey, Ikujiro Nonaka, Henry Chesbrough, Robert S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton and Henry Mintzberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Long Range Planning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Long Range Planning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Long Range Planning.

Countries where authors publish in Long Range Planning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Long Range Planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Long Range Planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long Range Planning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025