Zoltan Matolcsy
- Accounting top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Management Information Systems top 2%
- Finance top 2%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bernhard WiederMartin BugejaPeter BoothHelen SpiropoulosAnne WyattMaria‐Luise OssimitzStephen S LimPeter Wells
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (48 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (40 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Zoltan Matolcsy
65 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Accounting 1.1k
- Strategy and Management 608
- Management Information Systems 334
- Finance 296
- Gender Studies 169
Countries citing papers authored by Zoltan Matolcsy
This map shows the geographic impact of Zoltan Matolcsy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zoltan Matolcsy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zoltan Matolcsy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zoltan Matolcsy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zoltan Matolcsy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zoltan Matolcsy. The network helps show where Zoltan Matolcsy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zoltan Matolcsy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zoltan Matolcsy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zoltan Matolcsy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zoltan Matolcsy. Zoltan Matolcsy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | Impact of Big Data Analytics on Decision Making and Performance | 7 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Is Continuous Disclosure Associated with Board Independence | 25 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | Are we paying our CEOs too much | 4 |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Zoltan Matolcsy
Zoltan Matolcsy is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (48 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (40 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.1k citations), Strategy and Management (608 citations) and Management Information Systems (334 citations). Zoltan Matolcsy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Wieder, Martin Bugeja, Peter Booth, Helen Spiropoulos, Anne Wyatt, Maria‐Luise Ossimitz, Stephen S Lim, Peter Wells, Donald J. Stokes and Pernilla Lindén. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Accounting Research and Journal of Banking & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.