Paul Redford
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mercè Prat‐SalaRonald FischerCharles HarbEveline María Leal AssmarMaria Cristina FerreiraJoscha KärtnerMustapha AchouiBor‐Shiuan Cheng
- Topics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers)Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyBritish Journal of Educational PsychologyEducational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomLebanonNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Paul Redford
7 papers receiving 537 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Education 228
- Social Psychology 198
- Sociology and Political Science 125
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 102
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 97
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Redford
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Redford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Redford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Redford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Redford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Redford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Redford. The network helps show where Paul Redford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Redford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Redford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Redford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Redford. Paul Redford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | Challenge and change: Police identity, morale and goodwill in an age of austerity | 6 |
| 5 | Police identity in a time of rapid organizational, social and political change: A pilot report, Avon and Somersetconstabulary | 1 |
| 6 | 101 | |
| 7 | 209 | |
| 8 | 129 | |
| 9 | 77 |
About Paul Redford
Paul Redford is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (198 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 citations) and Education (228 citations). Paul Redford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Lebanon and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mercè Prat‐Sala, Ronald Fischer, Charles Harb, Eveline María Leal Assmar, Maria Cristina Ferreira, Joscha Kärtner, Mustapha Achoui, Bor‐Shiuan Cheng, Sharon Glazer and Jan Hofer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, British Journal of Educational Psychology and Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.