Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms
2014541 citationsPaul Baepler, J. D. Walker et al.Computers & Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Baepler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Baepler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Baepler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Baepler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Baepler. The network helps show where Paul Baepler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Baepler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Baepler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Baepler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Baepler. Paul Baepler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baepler, Paul. (2021). Student Anxiety In Active Learning Classrooms: Apprehensions and Acceptance of Formal Learning Environments. 10(2).5 indexed citations
Walker, J. D. & Paul Baepler. (2018). Social context matters: Predicting outcomes in formal learning environments. 7(2). 1–11.7 indexed citations
4.
Walker, J. D. & Paul Baepler. (2017). Measuring Social Relations in New Classroom Spaces: Development and Validation of the Social Context and Learning Environments (SCALE) Survey. 6(3). 34–41.11 indexed citations
5.
Baepler, Paul. (2016). A Guide to Teaching in the Active Learning Classroom: History, Research, and Practice. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).45 indexed citations
6.
Baepler, Paul, David Brooks, & J. D. Walker. (2014). Active learning spaces. Jossey-Bass eBooks.7 indexed citations
Baepler, Paul, J. D. Walker, & M. D. Driessen. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education. 78. 227–236.541 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Brooks, David, J. D. Walker, & Paul Baepler. (2014). Editors’ Notes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2014(137). 1–8.2 indexed citations
Walker, J. D., David Brooks, & Paul Baepler. (2011). Pedagogy and Space: Empirical Research on New Learning Environments.. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 34(4).53 indexed citations
12.
Baepler, Paul. (2010). A Teaching, Technology, and Faculty Development Timeline.. The journal of faculty development. 24(2). 40–48.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2008). Scratch This! the IF-AT as a Technique for Stimulating Group Discussion and Exposing Misconceptions. The journal of college science teaching. 37(4). 48–53.16 indexed citations
Baepler, Paul. (2003). White Slaves, African Masters. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 588(1). 90–104.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.