Sehoya Cotner

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
76 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Sehoya Cotner is a scholar working on Education, Safety Research and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sehoya Cotner has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Education, 23 papers in Safety Research and 17 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sehoya Cotner's work include Career Development and Diversity (22 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (18 papers) and Evolution and Science Education (11 papers). Sehoya Cotner is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (22 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (18 papers) and Evolution and Science Education (11 papers). Sehoya Cotner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Sweden. Sehoya Cotner's co-authors include Cissy J. Ballen, Randy Moore, J. D. Walker, Paul Baepler, Shima Salehi, David Brooks, Seth Thompson, Abby Grace Drake, Stepfanie M. Aguillon and Robin Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Sehoya Cotner

70 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 25 50 75 100

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sehoya Cotner United States 23 892 354 337 240 173 76 1.5k
Katelyn M. Cooper United States 26 890 1.0× 525 1.5× 492 1.5× 209 0.9× 142 0.8× 73 1.8k
Nancy W. Brickhouse United States 19 2.0k 2.2× 455 1.3× 310 0.9× 1.0k 4.3× 267 1.5× 37 2.4k
Andrew W. Shouse United States 7 861 1.0× 145 0.4× 240 0.7× 451 1.9× 197 1.1× 10 1.5k
Gili Marbach‐Ad United States 21 1.3k 1.4× 65 0.2× 177 0.5× 493 2.1× 100 0.6× 71 1.7k
Sarah Miller United States 10 895 1.0× 223 0.6× 261 0.8× 229 1.0× 39 0.2× 14 1.4k
Sam S Donovan United States 9 1.2k 1.3× 65 0.2× 272 0.8× 606 2.5× 78 0.5× 24 1.9k
David I. Hanauer United States 22 1.1k 1.2× 628 1.8× 251 0.7× 439 1.8× 155 0.9× 67 2.5k
Jennifer L. Momsen United States 16 973 1.1× 58 0.2× 231 0.7× 282 1.2× 43 0.2× 32 1.3k
Sherry A. Southerland United States 36 2.6k 2.9× 181 0.5× 691 2.1× 1.2k 5.0× 411 2.4× 91 3.4k
Cissy J. Ballen United States 20 903 1.0× 369 1.0× 247 0.7× 274 1.1× 107 0.6× 64 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Sehoya Cotner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sehoya Cotner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sehoya Cotner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sehoya Cotner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sehoya Cotner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sehoya Cotner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sehoya Cotner. The network helps show where Sehoya Cotner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sehoya Cotner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sehoya Cotner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sehoya Cotner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sehoya Cotner. Sehoya Cotner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Christiansen, Elizabeth, et al.. (2025). STEM students prefer assessment practices known to reduce the impact of test anxiety. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 43–65.
2.
Schneider, Joel P., Sanne Boessenkool, Jonathan Soulé, et al.. (2024). Creating better internships by understanding mentor challenges: findings from a series of focus groups. International Journal of STEM Education. 11(1). 3 indexed citations
3.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2022). Real-time text message surveys reveal student perceptions of personnel resources throughout a course-based research experience. PLoS ONE. 17(2). e0264188–e0264188. 1 indexed citations
5.
Vandvik, Vigdis, et al.. (2022). Cooperative learning goes online: teaching and learning intervention in a digital environment impacts psychosocial outcomes in biology students. International Journal of Educational Research. 117. 102114–102114. 17 indexed citations
6.
Lane, A. Kelly, Aud H. Halbritter, Elizabeth A. Law, et al.. (2022). Close to open—Factors that hinder and promote open science in ecology research and education. PLoS ONE. 17(12). e0278339–e0278339. 4 indexed citations
7.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2021). Graduate- and undergraduate-student perceptions of and preferences for teaching practices in STEM classrooms. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 7 indexed citations
8.
Geange, Sonya R., Jonathan von Oppen, Tanya Strydom, et al.. (2020). Next‐generation field courses: Integrating Open Science and online learning. Ecology and Evolution. 11(8). 3577–3587. 7 indexed citations
9.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2020). In a “Scientist Spotlight” Intervention, Diverse Student Identities Matter. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. 21(1). 34 indexed citations
10.
Henning, Jeremiah A., et al.. (2019). Hidden Identities Shape Student Perceptions of Active Learning Environments. Frontiers in Education. 4. 39 indexed citations
11.
Sullivan, Lauren L., Cissy J. Ballen, & Sehoya Cotner. (2018). Small group gender ratios impact biology class performance and peer evaluations. PLoS ONE. 13(4). e0195129–e0195129. 14 indexed citations
12.
Walker, J. D., et al.. (2017). What Determines Student Acceptance of Politically Controversial Scientific Conclusions. The journal of college science teaching. 47(2). 46–56. 5 indexed citations
13.
Ballen, Cissy J., Shima Salehi, & Sehoya Cotner. (2017). Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology. PLoS ONE. 12(10). e0186419–e0186419. 80 indexed citations
14.
Cotner, Sehoya & Cissy J. Ballen. (2017). Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?. PLoS ONE. 12(12). e0189610–e0189610. 56 indexed citations
15.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2016). Bold, Sedentary Fathead Minnows Have More Parasites. Zebrafish. 13(4). 248–255. 3 indexed citations
16.
Cotner, Sehoya, Cissy J. Ballen, David Brooks, & Randy Moore. (2011). Instructor Gender and Student Confidence in the Sciences: A Need for More Role Models?.. The journal of college science teaching. 40(5). 96–101. 29 indexed citations
17.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2011). Vodcasts and Captures: Using Multimedia to Improve Student Learning in Introductory Biology. 20(1). 97–111. 16 indexed citations
18.
Moore, Randy, et al.. (2009). The Influence of Religion and High School Biology Courses on Students' Knowledge of Evolution When They Enter College. 9(2). 4–12. 22 indexed citations
19.
Cotner, Sehoya, David Brooks, & Randy Moore. (2009). IS THE AGE OF THE EARTH ONE OF OUR “SOREST TROUBLES?” STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT DEEP TIME AFFECT THEIR ACCEPTANCE OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY. Evolution. 64(3). 858–864. 35 indexed citations
20.
Cotner, Sehoya, et al.. (2008). Scratch This! the IF-AT as a Technique for Stimulating Group Discussion and Exposing Misconceptions. The journal of college science teaching. 37(4). 48–53. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026