This map shows the geographic impact of David Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Brooks more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Brooks. The network helps show where David Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Brooks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Brooks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Brooks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Brooks. David Brooks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brown, Malcolm, David Brooks, Mark McCormack, et al.. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 2–50.100 indexed citations
2.
Coughlan, Daniel, et al.. (2019). The effect of a 12-week strength and conditioning programme on youth golf performance. 8(1). 11147.2 indexed citations
3.
Brooks, David, et al.. (2016). Keeping up with the Times: Improving the Modern Counselor through Professional Identity Development, Technological Policy, and Positive Risk Taking. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1(1). 2.1 indexed citations
4.
Baepler, Paul, David Brooks, & J. D. Walker. (2014). Active learning spaces. Jossey-Bass eBooks.7 indexed citations
5.
Brooks, David. (2013). The fallacies: Theory, saturation capitalism and the animal. Southerly. 73(2). 47.1 indexed citations
6.
Brooks, David. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behavior. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.84 indexed citations
7.
Walker, J. D., David Brooks, & Paul Baepler. (2011). Pedagogy and Space: Empirical Research on New Learning Environments.. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 34(4).53 indexed citations
8.
Cotner, Sehoya, Cissy J. Ballen, David Brooks, & Randy Moore. (2011). Instructor Gender and Student Confidence in the Sciences: A Need for More Role Models?.. The journal of college science teaching. 40(5). 96–101.29 indexed citations
9.
Brooks, David, et al.. (2011). Beyond Satisfaction: Toward an Outcomes-Based, Procedural Model of Faculty Development Program Evaluation. The journal of faculty development. 25(3). 5–12.10 indexed citations
Brooks, David & Jonathan Fox. (2002). Cross-border dialogues : U.S.-Mexico social movement networking.38 indexed citations
15.
Crippen, Kent J., et al.. (2002). Assessing Students in Online Courses. International journal on e-learning. 3(2). 28–31.1 indexed citations
16.
Brooks, David. (2002). Born to Be Mild. The New York times book review. 8.3 indexed citations
17.
Brooks, David. (1999). Scheherezade - the search for story: Recent Australian fiction set in china and Southeast Asia. Southerly. 59. 228.
18.
Brooks, David, et al.. (1993). Pe'l A'tukwey : Let Me... Tell a Story : Recent Work by Mi'Kmaq and Maliseet Artists.
19.
Brooks, David. (1992). The Search for Counterparts: A Labor-Community Agenda Must Cross Borders As Well. eCommons (Cornell University). 1(19). 3.1 indexed citations
20.
Brooks, David. (1985). Poetry and Sexual Difference. Meanjin. 44(1). 69.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.