Rob Smeets

26.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
239 papers, 9.6k citations indexed

About

Rob Smeets is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Rob Smeets has authored 239 papers receiving a total of 9.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 151 papers in Pharmacology, 97 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 44 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Rob Smeets's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (150 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (50 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (46 papers). Rob Smeets is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (150 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (50 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (46 papers). Rob Smeets collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Australia. Rob Smeets's co-authors include J. André Knottnerus, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Jeanine Verbunt, Raymond Ostelo, Steven J. Kamper, Arnold D.M. Kester, Albère Köke, Jaime Guzmán, Alessandro Chiarotto and Maurits W. van Tulder and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Rob Smeets

224 papers receiving 9.3k citations

Hit Papers

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chro... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2015 2014 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rob Smeets Netherlands 50 6.6k 3.0k 1.6k 1.5k 1.1k 239 9.6k
Michael K. Nicholas Australia 54 7.7k 1.2× 2.7k 0.9× 2.3k 1.5× 1.2k 0.8× 570 0.5× 194 11.1k
Paulo H. Ferreira Australia 51 6.6k 1.0× 1.9k 0.6× 857 0.5× 2.4k 1.6× 728 0.7× 285 10.4k
Steven J. Kamper Australia 46 5.5k 0.8× 1.7k 0.6× 996 0.6× 1.6k 1.1× 516 0.5× 212 8.8k
James H. McAuley Australia 58 9.9k 1.5× 2.8k 0.9× 2.1k 1.3× 3.1k 2.1× 683 0.6× 270 13.5k
Jane Latimer Australia 54 6.4k 1.0× 1.5k 0.5× 986 0.6× 2.8k 1.9× 515 0.5× 190 9.3k
Debra K. Weiner United States 46 4.0k 0.6× 1.6k 0.5× 902 0.6× 1.1k 0.7× 519 0.5× 134 7.0k
Nadine E. Foster United Kingdom 66 9.8k 1.5× 2.8k 0.9× 2.3k 1.5× 2.5k 1.7× 918 0.9× 356 16.3k
Mira Meeus Belgium 62 6.3k 0.9× 4.4k 1.5× 1.9k 1.2× 1.1k 0.7× 441 0.4× 317 11.7k
Joan M. Romano United States 47 5.8k 0.9× 2.8k 0.9× 2.3k 1.4× 900 0.6× 290 0.3× 101 9.5k
Kathryn M. Refshauge Australia 71 7.4k 1.1× 2.3k 0.8× 1.7k 1.1× 2.7k 1.8× 680 0.6× 289 18.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Smeets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Smeets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Smeets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Smeets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Smeets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Smeets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Smeets. The network helps show where Rob Smeets may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Smeets

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Smeets. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Smeets based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Smeets. Rob Smeets is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Heusdens, Christiaan H. W., et al.. (2024). Unravelling relationships between obesity, diabetes, and factors related to somatosensory functioning in knee osteoarthritis patients. Clinical Rheumatology. 43(8). 2637–2645. 2 indexed citations
4.
Mertens, Michel GCAM, et al.. (2024). Prediction models for treatment success after an interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment program. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 70. 152592–152592. 2 indexed citations
5.
Smeets, Rob, et al.. (2023). Machine learning clinical decision support for interdisciplinary multimodal chronic musculoskeletal pain treatment. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 1177070–1177070. 10 indexed citations
6.
Köke, Albère, et al.. (2023). Physiotherapists Using the Biopsychosocial Model for Chronic Pain: Barriers and Facilitators—A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(2). 1634–1634. 34 indexed citations
7.
Sneijder, Petra, et al.. (2023). Consultations Preliminary to Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Rehabilitation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 23–48.
8.
Mertens, Michel GCAM, Mira Meeus, Isabel Baert, et al.. (2023). Identification of Metabolic Factors and Inflammatory Markers Predictive of Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(10). 5796–5796. 7 indexed citations
9.
Gross, Douglas P., Lisa C. Carlesso, Joy C. MacDermid, et al.. (2022). Presurgical rehabilitation program for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A pilot randomized controlled trial protocol. Canadian Journal of Pain. 6(4). 1 indexed citations
11.
Wood, Lianne, Annette Bishop, Martyn Lewis, et al.. (2021). Treatment targets of exercise for persistent non-specific low back pain: a consensus study. Physiotherapy. 112. 78–86. 12 indexed citations
13.
Wittink, Harriët, Ulrike Kaiser, Jos Kleijnen, et al.. (2021). Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. European Journal of Pain. 26(2). 310–335. 49 indexed citations
14.
Froud, Robert, Michele C. Battié, Kim Burton, et al.. (2020). Opportunities and challenges around adapting supported employment interventions for people with chronic low back pain: modified nominal group technique. Disability and Rehabilitation. 43(19). 2750–2757. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rothgangel, Andreas, Susy Braun, Rob Smeets, & Anna Beurskens. (2019). Feasibility of a traditional and teletreatment approach to mirror therapy in patients with phantom limb pain: a process evaluation performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 33(10). 1649–1660. 13 indexed citations
17.
Sneijder, Petra, et al.. (2019). Improving patient–practitioner interaction in chronic pain rehabilitation. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 19(4). 843–853. 2 indexed citations
18.
Nicholas, Michael K., Steven J. Linton, Chris J. Main, et al.. (2018). Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 29(2). 295–302. 23 indexed citations
19.
Hollander, Marlies den, Mariëlle E. J. B. Goossens, Jeroen de Jong, et al.. (2016). Expose or protect? A randomized controlled trial of exposure in vivo vs pain-contingent treatment as usual in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Pain. 157(10). 2318–2329. 97 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026