Pam Nicol
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Rochelle WatkinsLinda ShieldsRose ChapmanSandra CarrLinda Slack‐SmithNigel KingSarah CherianHelen Wright
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Pam Nicol
16 papers receiving 273 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Social Psychology 99
- General Health Professions 92
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 92
- Reproductive Medicine 52
- Sociology and Political Science 47
Countries citing papers authored by Pam Nicol
This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Nicol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Nicol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Nicol more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Nicol
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Nicol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Nicol. The network helps show where Pam Nicol may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pam Nicol
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pam Nicol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pam Nicol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pam Nicol. Pam Nicol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | Interprofessional Education for Health Professionals in Western Australia: Perspectives and Activity | 18 |
| 12 | 86 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | Evaluation of an undergraduate child development teaching program using a home visit and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) | 1 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 14 |
About Pam Nicol
Pam Nicol is a scholar working on Family Practice, Research and Theory and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 16 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Family Practice (17 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (52 citations). Pam Nicol has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rochelle Watkins, Linda Shields, Rose Chapman, Sandra Carr, Linda Slack‐Smith, Nigel King, Sarah Cherian, Helen Wright, Andy Wearn and Terry J. Tunny. Their work appears in journals such as Resuscitation, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.