Nina Urala

1.7k total citations
10 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Nina Urala is a scholar working on Food Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Urala has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Food Science, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nina Urala's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (7 papers) and Culinary Culture and Tourism (5 papers). Nina Urala is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (7 papers) and Culinary Culture and Tourism (5 papers). Nina Urala collaborates with scholars based in Finland and United States. Nina Urala's co-authors include Liisa Lähteenmäki, Anne Arvola, Vtt Publications, Hely Tuorila, Anna Huotilainen, Howard G. Schutz, Kaisa Poutanen, Raija‐Liisa Heiniö, Jukka Vainionpää and Anne Pihlanto-Leppälä and has published in prestigious journals such as Appetite, Food Quality and Preference and International Journal of Food Science & Technology.

In The Last Decade

Nina Urala

9 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nina Urala Finland	9	856	786	282	227	187	10	1.2k
Leandro Machín Uruguay	21	1.1k 1.3×	497 0.6×	490 1.7×	112 0.5×	154 0.8×	53	1.6k
Marta Sajdakowska Poland	13	310 0.4×	754 1.0×	266 0.9×	318 1.4×	151 0.8×	52	1.2k
Stefan Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann Germany	14	825 1.0×	276 0.4×	222 0.8×	94 0.4×	147 0.8×	29	1.0k
Annika Åström Sweden	10	339 0.4×	316 0.4×	156 0.6×	260 1.1×	66 0.4×	16	734
Mi Sook Cho South Korea	18	275 0.3×	492 0.6×	156 0.6×	193 0.9×	516 2.8×	140	1.3k
María Rosa Curutchet Uruguay	25	1.4k 1.6×	466 0.6×	520 1.8×	77 0.3×	166 0.9×	57	1.7k
Christine Hoefkens Belgium	13	415 0.5×	351 0.4×	249 0.9×	248 1.1×	65 0.3×	16	859
Michele Contel Belgium	3	161 0.2×	657 0.8×	202 0.7×	307 1.4×	100 0.5×	4	914
Jorge Herman Behrens Brazil	23	156 0.2×	815 1.0×	129 0.5×	308 1.4×	311 1.7×	59	1.3k
Markus Winkelmann Italy	7	365 0.4×	288 0.4×	140 0.5×	130 0.6×	101 0.5×	10	578

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Urala

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Urala's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Urala with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Urala more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Urala

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Urala. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Urala. The network helps show where Nina Urala may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Urala

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Urala. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Urala based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Urala. Nina Urala is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Urala, Nina, et al.. (2011). Consumer Perceptions of “Functional Food” in the United States. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 17(4). 407–419. 21 indexed citations

2.

Tuorila, Hely, et al.. (2007). Comparison of affective rating scales and their relationship to variables reflecting food consumption. Food Quality and Preference. 19(1). 51–61. 83 indexed citations

3.

Urala, Nina & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2006). Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices. Appetite. 47(3). 302–314. 32 indexed citations

4.

Publications, Vtt & Nina Urala. (2005). Functional foods in Finland Consumers' views, attitudes and willingness to use. 37 indexed citations

5.

Urala, Nina & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2005). Consumers’ changing attitudes towards functional foods. Food Quality and Preference. 18(1). 1–12. 348 indexed citations

6.

Urala, Nina & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2004). Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods. Food Quality and Preference. 15(7-8). 793–803. 342 indexed citations

7.

Urala, Nina, Anne Arvola, & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2003). Strength of health-related claims and their perceived advantage. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 38(7). 815–826. 94 indexed citations

8.

Urala, Nina & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2003). Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. Nutrition & Food Science. 33(4). 148–158. 245 indexed citations

9.

Lähteenmäki, Liisa, Anne Arvola, Nina Urala, et al.. (2001). Terveysväittämät ja terveysvaikutteisten elintarvikkeiden hyväksyttävyys. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).

10.

Heiniö, Raija‐Liisa, Nina Urala, Jukka Vainionpää, Kaisa Poutanen, & Hely Tuorila. (1997). Identity and overall acceptance of two types of sour rye bread. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 32(2). 169–178. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact