Nidthida Lin

24 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

Nidthida Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 135
  • Health Informatics 23
  • Business and International Management 31
  • Strategy and Management 188
  • Management Information Systems 110
Replace Shiko M. Ben‐Menahem with:
Shiko M. Ben‐Menahem Switzerland
Fadi Abdelfattah Oman
Marco Balzano Italy
Jeandri Robertson South Africa
Mona Ashok United Kingdom
Alev Elçi Türkiye
Xavier Ferràs Spain
Jason MacVaugh United Kingdom
Fiona Schweitzer France
Jonny Holmström Sweden
Nidthida Lin relative to Shiko M. Ben‐Menahem Switzerland Shiko M. Ben‐Menahem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Shiko M. Ben‐Menahem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nidthida Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nidthida Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nidthida Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nidthida Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nidthida Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nidthida Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nidthida Lin. The network helps show where Nidthida Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nidthida Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nidthida Lin Line = papers co-authored together Nidthida Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018161
2 201777
3 202174
4 202235
5 202028
6
How much does a company's reputation matter in recruiting?
201325
7 202023
8 201616
9 202216
10 201715
11 201815
12 200611
13 20168
14 20247
15 20236
16 20245
17 20124
18 20243
19 20192
20 20192

About Nidthida Lin

Nidthida Lin is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Accounting, having authored 24 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (5 papers), International Business and FDI (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (135 citations), Health Informatics (23 citations), Business and International Management (31 citations), Strategy and Management (188 citations) and Management Information Systems (110 citations). Nidthida Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Massimo Garbuio, Stephen Chen, Ralf Wilden, Timothy M. Devinney, Ted Tschang, Andy Dong, Dan Lovallo, Grahame R. Dowling, Jan Hohberger and Krithika Randhawa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Long Range Planning, International Business Review, California Management Review and Journal of Knowledge Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact