International Business Review

2.0k papers and 87.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in International Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 87.4k indexed citations. Papers published in International Business Review usually cover Strategy and Management (1.5k papers), Accounting (665 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (391 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (1.2k papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (650 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (624 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Business Review are John H. Dunning, Alex Rialp, Justin Paul, Jeremy Clegg, Mats Forsgren, Sylvie Chetty, Peter J. Buckley, Nicole Coviello, Hugh Munro and S. Tamer Çavuşgil.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Business Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Business Review.

Countries where authors publish in International Business Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Business Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025