Nicola Parker
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michelle O’ReillyG. E. HibberdLen FisherE.E. MitchellN. KrogIan HutchbyTamara PowerClaudia Virdun
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers)Higher Education Practises and Engagement (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomBelarus
In The Last Decade
Nicola Parker
34 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
- Sociology and Political Science 417
- General Health Professions 341
- Clinical Psychology 261
- Education 252
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 206
Countries citing papers authored by Nicola Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicola Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicola Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicola Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicola Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicola Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicola Parker. The network helps show where Nicola Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicola Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicola Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicola Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicola Parker. Nicola Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | Connecting quality learning and teaching with sessional staff standards: The BLASST project | 1 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Peer review in online and blended learning environments | 4 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | Assessing Online Collaboratories: A Peer Review of Teaching and Learning | 3 |
| 17 | Developing peer review of teaching in blended learning environments: Frameworks and challenges | 10 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Nicola Parker
Nicola Parker is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Language and Linguistics and Education, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (14 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (21 citations) and General Health Professions (341 citations). Nicola Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Michelle O’Reilly, G. E. Hibberd, Len Fisher, E.E. Mitchell, N. Krog, Ian Hutchby, Tamara Power, Claudia Virdun, Joanne Gray and Jo McKenzie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Journal of Food Science and Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.