Kate Stewart

5.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
31 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Kate Stewart is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Stewart has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Kate Stewart's work include Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers). Kate Stewart is often cited by papers focused on Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers). Kate Stewart collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Kate Stewart's co-authors include Paul Gill, Barbara Chadwick, Elizabeth Treasure, P Burnard, Matthew Williams, Matthew Cole, Sarah Purdy, Chris Salisbury, Sunita Procter and Leah Bowen and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Care, Public Health Nutrition and BDJ.

In The Last Decade

Kate Stewart

29 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Methods of data collectio... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 2008 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Stewart United Kingdom 14 682 629 450 386 311 31 3.0k
Paul Gill United Kingdom 17 712 1.0× 523 0.8× 634 1.4× 401 1.0× 424 1.4× 45 3.1k
Amanda Kenny Australia 32 1.6k 2.4× 624 1.0× 525 1.2× 471 1.2× 384 1.2× 111 3.4k
Virginia Dickson‐Swift Australia 28 1.2k 1.7× 1.4k 2.2× 370 0.8× 334 0.9× 576 1.9× 78 3.3k
Ian Plewis United Kingdom 30 614 0.9× 707 1.1× 315 0.7× 744 1.9× 584 1.9× 105 4.1k
Julie Green Australia 22 849 1.2× 485 0.8× 825 1.8× 298 0.8× 710 2.3× 94 2.7k
Kelly K. O’Brien United States 12 675 1.0× 288 0.5× 435 1.0× 141 0.4× 305 1.0× 23 2.5k
Barbara Chadwick United Kingdom 28 889 1.3× 489 0.8× 641 1.4× 358 0.9× 377 1.2× 90 4.3k
Michael Noble United Kingdom 20 900 1.3× 778 1.2× 442 1.0× 244 0.6× 308 1.0× 61 3.3k
Kjeld Møller Pedersen Denmark 25 914 1.3× 751 1.2× 365 0.8× 403 1.0× 252 0.8× 150 4.5k
Corey H. Basch United States 29 852 1.2× 1.4k 2.2× 390 0.9× 283 0.7× 718 2.3× 223 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Stewart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Stewart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Stewart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Stewart. The network helps show where Kate Stewart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Stewart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Stewart. Kate Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gray, Andrew B., et al.. (2019). Sharing Learnings: The Methodology, Optimisation and Benefits of Moving Subsurface Data to the Public Cloud. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019. 1–5. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cole, Matthew & Kate Stewart. (2017). Speciesism Party: A Vegan Critique of Sausage Party. ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment. 24(4). 767–786.
3.
Cole, Matthew & Kate Stewart. (2016). Our Children and Other Animals. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 32 indexed citations
4.
Procter, Sunita, Kate Stewart, David Reeves, et al.. (2014). Complex consultations in primary care: a tool for assessing the range of health problems and issues addressed in general practice consultations. BMC Family Practice. 15(1). 105–105. 14 indexed citations
5.
Salisbury, Chris, Sunita Procter, Kate Stewart, et al.. (2013). The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. British Journal of General Practice. 63(616). e751–e759. 83 indexed citations
6.
Sibley, Chris G., Kate Stewart, Carla Houkamau, et al.. (2011). Ethnic group stereotypes in New Zealand. New Zealand journal of psychology. 40(2). 25. 24 indexed citations
7.
Bagchi, Ann D., et al.. (2011). Treatment and Outcomes for Congestive Heart Failure by Race/Ethnicity in TRICARE. Medical Care. 49(5). 489–495. 35 indexed citations
8.
Salisbury, Chris, Kate Stewart, Sarah Purdy, et al.. (2011). Making the most of evaluation: A mixed methods study in the English NHS. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 16(4). 218–225. 2 indexed citations
9.
Salisbury, Chris, Kate Stewart, Sarah Purdy, et al.. (2011). Lessons from evaluation of the NHS white paper Our Health, Our Care, Our Say. British Journal of General Practice. 61(592). e766–e771. 1 indexed citations
10.
Gill, Paul, et al.. (2010). Children’s understanding of and motivations for toothbrushing: a qualitative study. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 9(1). 79–86. 30 indexed citations
11.
Burnard, P, Paul Gill, Kate Stewart, Elizabeth Treasure, & Barbara Chadwick. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. BDJ. 204(8). 429–432. 787 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Stewart, Kate, Paul Gill, Barbara Chadwick, & Elizabeth Treasure. (2008). Qualitative research in dentistry. BDJ. 204(5). 235–239. 93 indexed citations
13.
Morgan, Maria, et al.. (2008). A content analysis of children’s television advertising: focus on food and oral health. Public Health Nutrition. 12(6). 748–755. 31 indexed citations
14.
Gill, Paul, Kate Stewart, Elizabeth Treasure, & Barbara Chadwick. (2008). Conducting qualitative interviews with school children in dental research. BDJ. 204(7). 371–374. 31 indexed citations
15.
Gill, Paul, Kate Stewart, Elizabeth Treasure, & Barbara Chadwick. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. BDJ. 204(6). 291–295. 1475 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Stewart, Kate & Matthew Williams. (2005). Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research. 5(4). 395–416. 251 indexed citations
17.
Stewart, Kate, et al.. (2002). Overactive Bladder Patients and the Role of the Pharmacist. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996). 42(3). 469–478. 11 indexed citations
18.
Bowker, Lesley K., et al.. (1998). Do General Practitioners Know When Living Wills Are Legal?. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London. 32(4). 351–353. 5 indexed citations
19.
Plouffe, Leo, et al.. (1997). P-29.. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 4(4). 262–262. 1 indexed citations
20.
Stewart, Kate. (1989). Slow steps towards success.. PubMed. 85(5). 43–5. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026