N.A. Pensel

1.2k citations
21 papers · 833 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

N.A. Pensel

21 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers

N.A. Pensel
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Animal Science and Zoology 580
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 173
  • Biochemistry 94
  • Food Science 164
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 124
Replace Ana María Sancho with:
Ana María Sancho Argentina
Virginia C. Resconi Spain
Michael Enser United Kingdom
A.M. Descalzo Argentina
Y.A. Ziprin United States
Maria A. Charismiadou Greece
E. M. Insani Argentina
T. A. Houser United States
Nelson Huerta-Leidenz United States
Nathalie Kondjoyan France
N.A. Pensel relative to Ana María Sancho Argentina Ana María Sancho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ana María Sancho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.A. Pensel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.A. Pensel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.A. Pensel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.A. Pensel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.A. Pensel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.A. Pensel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.A. Pensel. The network helps show where N.A. Pensel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside N.A. Pensel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.A. Pensel Line = papers co-authored together N.A. Pensel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2007104
2 200795
3 200743
4 200713
5 2006117
6 200613
7 200510
8 2005208
9 20055
10
Electronic nose and SPME-GAS cromatography for the study of the odor profile of whole milk power
20052
11 200412
12 200427
13 200427
14 200336
15 20026
16 200034
17 199815
18 199711
19 19956
20
Influence of Experimental Conditions on Porcine Muscle and its Effect on Oxidation
199020

About N.A. Pensel

N.A. Pensel is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Biochemistry, Sensory Systems, Process Chemistry and Technology and Food Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (10 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (580 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (173 citations), Biochemistry (94 citations), Food Science (164 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (124 citations). N.A. Pensel has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ana María Sancho, A.M. Descalzo, G. Grigioni, E. M. Insani, Pilar T. García, Andrea Biolatto, F. Carduza, Luciana Rossetti, Jorge J. Casal and Carlos A. Margaría. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, International Journal of Dairy Technology, Food Chemistry and Postharvest Biology and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026