Mikko Sandelin
- Management Information Systems top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Marketing top 10%
- Co-authors
- David S. BedfordTeemu MalmiChristian AxDaniel JohansonDag Øivind MadsenPoul IsraelsenMaurice GosselinSophie Hoozée
- Topics
- Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers)Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Mikko Sandelin
7 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Management Information Systems 275
- Strategy and Management 174
- Accounting 143
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 120
- Marketing 55
Countries citing papers authored by Mikko Sandelin
This map shows the geographic impact of Mikko Sandelin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mikko Sandelin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mikko Sandelin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mikko Sandelin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mikko Sandelin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mikko Sandelin. The network helps show where Mikko Sandelin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mikko Sandelin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mikko Sandelin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mikko Sandelin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mikko Sandelin. Mikko Sandelin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | Culture and management control interdependence: An analysis of complementary control choices to delegation in Western cultural regions | 2 |
| 3 | 217 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Operation of Management Control Practices as a Package - A Case Study on Control System Variety in a Growth Firm Context | 2 |
| 7 | 136 |
About Mikko Sandelin
Mikko Sandelin is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (275 citations), Accounting (143 citations) and Strategy and Management (174 citations). Mikko Sandelin has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include David S. Bedford, Teemu Malmi, Christian Ax, Daniel Johanson, Dag Øivind Madsen, Poul Israelsen, Maurice Gosselin, Sophie Hoozée, Rolf Brühl and Torkel Strömsten. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Management Accounting Research and Journal of Management Control.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.