Management Accounting Research

695 papers and 43.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 695 papers published in Management Accounting Research in the last decades have received a total of 43.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Management Accounting Research usually cover Management Information Systems (481 papers), Accounting (221 papers) and Strategy and Management (195 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting and Organizational Management (453 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (155 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Management Accounting Research are David Otley, Teemu Malmi, Robert W. Scapens, Sven Modell, Hanne Nørreklit, John Burns, Kim Langfield‐Smith, Markus Granlund, David A. Brown and Kari Lukka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Management Accounting Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Management Accounting Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Management Accounting Research.

Countries where authors publish in Management Accounting Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Management Accounting Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Management Accounting Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Management Accounting Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025