Countries citing papers authored by Michael Sankey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Sankey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Sankey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Sankey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Sankey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Sankey. The network helps show where Michael Sankey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Sankey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Sankey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Sankey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Sankey. Michael Sankey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sankey, Michael & Sanjaya Mishra. (2019). Benchmarking Toolkit for Technology-Enabled Learning. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 1–58.4 indexed citations
5.
Sankey, Michael, et al.. (2019). Developing a Flipped Classroom Framework to Improve Tertiary Education Students' Learning Engagements in India.. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies). 15(2). 31–44.4 indexed citations
Reedy, Alison & Michael Sankey. (2015). Designing for relatedness. ASCILITE Publications. 235–247.1 indexed citations
10.
Sankey, Michael, et al.. (2014). Benchmarks for technology enhanced learning. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland).15 indexed citations
Palmer, Stuart, et al.. (2013). EXPLORING DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP FOR THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 16(2). 61–75.4 indexed citations
13.
Sankey, Michael. (2012). Aligning your ducks for the student learning journey: stories from the pond of distance ed. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 2012(1). 884–892.3 indexed citations
14.
Sankey, Michael, et al.. (2011). The impact of multiple representations of content using multimedia on learning outcomes across learning styles and modal preferences. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 7(3). 18–35.49 indexed citations
Birch, Dawn, et al.. (2010). The impact of multiple representations of content using multimedia on learning outcomes. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 7(4). 3–19.7 indexed citations
17.
Sankey, Michael & Henk Huijser. (2009). A ‘likely benefit’ from aligning Web2.0 technologies with an institutions learning and teaching agenda. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 2009(1). 3686–3695.3 indexed citations
18.
Birch, Dawn & Michael Sankey. (2008). Drivers For and Obstacles To the Development of Interactive Multimodal Technology-Mediated Distance Higher Education Courses. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 4(1). 66–79.14 indexed citations
19.
Sankey, Michael. (2006). A Neomillennial Learning Approach: Helping Non-Traditional Learners Studying at a Distance. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 2(4). 82–99.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.