Michael Parker
- Education top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert A. NashNaomi WinstoneSinéad BrophyLuisa ZuccoloAshley AkbariJonathan KennedyAlisha DaviesSimon Moore
- Topics
- Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers)Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers)Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Michael Parker
7 papers receiving 777 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Education 632
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 173
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 80
- Computer Science Applications 74
- Information Systems and Management 46
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Parker. The network helps show where Michael Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Parker. Michael Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processesbreakdown → | 522 |
| 8 | ‘It'd be useful, but I wouldn't use it’: barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipiencebreakdown → | 262 |
| 9 | Hand-assisted laparoscopic approach to ablation of the nephrosplenic space in standing horses: four cases. | 1 |
About Michael Parker
Michael Parker is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (632 citations), Family Practice (31 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (173 citations). Michael Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Nash, Naomi Winstone, Sinéad Brophy, Luisa Zuccolo, Ashley Akbari, Jonathan Kennedy, Alisha Davies, Simon Moore, Amrita Bandyopadhyay and James Healy. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Educational Psychologist and BMC Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.