Robert A. Nash
- Education top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Naomi WinstoneMichael ParkerKimberley A. WadeJulie CallahanGary W. ClearyTerry T. KenslerGiuliana MazzoniLewis J. Leeson
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (30 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers)Student Assessment and Feedback (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Robert A. Nash
88 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
- Education 959
- Cognitive Neuroscience 466
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 422
- Social Psychology 310
- Sociology and Political Science 244
Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Nash. The network helps show where Robert A. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert A. Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert A. Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert A. Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert A. Nash. Robert A. Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | The Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit (DEFT) | 8 |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | The effect of solvents on the ultraviolet absorbance of sunscreens | 48 |
| 19 | A method for calculating thermal sterilization conditions based upon process parametrics. | 4 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Robert A. Nash
Robert A. Nash is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (30 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (230 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (422 citations) and Education (959 citations). Robert A. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Naomi Winstone, Michael Parker, Kimberley A. Wade, Julie Callahan, Gary W. Cleary, Terry T. Kensler, Giuliana Mazzoni, Lewis J. Leeson, Andrew L. Clark and Maryanne Garry. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the IEEE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.