Michael P. Wilmot

23 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

Michael P. Wilmot
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Social Psychology 199
  • Clinical Psychology 199
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 142
  • Sociology and Political Science 99
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 83
Replace Scott Young with:
Scott Young United States
P. Richard Jeanneret United States
Robert Patrick United States
Niclas Schaper Germany
Qian Hu China
James A. Earles United States
Jean‐François Stich France
Adam M. Kanar Canada
Norman G. Peterson United States
John Wedman United States
Michael P. Wilmot relative to Scott Young United States Scott Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Scott Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael P. Wilmot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael P. Wilmot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael P. Wilmot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael P. Wilmot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael P. Wilmot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael P. Wilmot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael P. Wilmot. The network helps show where Michael P. Wilmot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael P. Wilmot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael P. Wilmot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael P. Wilmot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael P. Wilmot. Michael P. Wilmot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 23
3 3
4 4
5
Development of Joint Service Criterion Instruments for Enlisted Jobs
1
6 112
7 118
8 6
9
Personality and its Impacts across the Behavioral Sciences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings
2
10 33
11
Conceptual and methodological complexity of narrow trait measures in personality-outcome research: better knowledge by partitioning variance from multiple latent traits and measurement artifacts
9
12 25
13 11
14 14
15 1
16 5
17
Self-monitoring Personality at Work Revisited: A Comparative Meta-analysis
2
18 3
19 99
20 2

About Michael P. Wilmot

Michael P. Wilmot is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (142 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations) and Social Psychology (199 citations). Michael P. Wilmot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Deniz S. Öneş, Moutaz Khouja, Zbigniew Michalewicz, John D. Kammeyer‐Mueller, Connie R. Wanberg, Jack W. Kostal, Brenton M. Wiernik, David Stillwell, Michał Kosiński and Stephan Dilchert. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026