Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Maxine Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maxine Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maxine Greene more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maxine Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maxine Greene. The network helps show where Maxine Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maxine Greene
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maxine Greene.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maxine Greene based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maxine Greene. Maxine Greene is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Greene, Maxine. (2010). Prologue to Art, Social Imagination and Action. Western CEDAR (Western Washington University). 5(1). 2.10 indexed citations
2.
Greene, Maxine. (2006). From Jagged Landscapes to Possibility. Western CEDAR (Western Washington University). 1(1). 2.2 indexed citations
3.
Greene, Maxine, et al.. (1998). A light in dark times : Maxine Greene and the unfinished conversation. Teachers College Press eBooks.40 indexed citations
4.
Greene, Maxine. (1997). Metaphors and Multiples: Representation, the Arts, and History. Phi Delta Kappan. 78(5). 387.17 indexed citations
Greene, Maxine. (1993). What Are the Language Arts For. 18(2).1 indexed citations
9.
Greene, Maxine. (1993). Gender, Multiplicity, and Voice. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 94(5). 241–255.2 indexed citations
10.
Greene, Maxine. (1991). The Literacy Debate and the Public School: Going beyond the Functional.. Educational Horizons. 69(3).5 indexed citations
11.
Greene, Maxine. (1984). Excellence and The Basics. Education and Culture. 4(1). 22–28.1 indexed citations
Greene, Maxine. (1981). Aesthetic Literacy in General Education. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 82(5). 115–142.3 indexed citations
Greene, Maxine. (1979). Liberal Education and the Newcomer.. Phi Delta Kappan. 60(9).1 indexed citations
16.
Greene, Maxine. (1976). John Dewey and Moral Education.. Contemporary education.1 indexed citations
17.
Greene, Maxine. (1974). AN EXISTENTIALIST LOOK AT A. S. NEILL. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill. 9(1).1 indexed citations
18.
Greene, Maxine. (1970). Crisis in the Classroom. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 72(1). 133–141.1 indexed citations
19.
Greene, Maxine. (1969). The Arts in a Global Village.. Educational leadership.
20.
Greene, Maxine. (1968). For the Record: Technology and the Human Person. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 69(4). 385–393.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.