Countries citing papers authored by John Willinsky
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Willinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Willinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Willinsky more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Willinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Willinsky. The network helps show where John Willinsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Willinsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Willinsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Willinsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Willinsky. John Willinsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Campbell, Bob, John Willinsky, & Rick Anderson. (2010). Book Reviews. Learned Publishing. 23(3). 264–266.3 indexed citations
5.
Fischman, Gustavo E., Juan Pablo Alperín, & John Willinsky. (2010). Visibility and Quality in Spanish-Language Latin American Scholarly Publishing. Information Technologies and International Development. 6(4). 1–21.35 indexed citations
6.
Murray, Sally, et al.. (2008). No budget, no worries: free and open source publishing software in biomedical publishing. Elpub digital library. 140–148.1 indexed citations
7.
Willinsky, John, et al.. (2007). Open access on a zero budget: a case study of Postcolonial Text. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(3). 308.14 indexed citations
8.
Willinsky, John, et al.. (2007). Open Access on a Zero Budget: A Case Study of "Postcolonial Text": Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Three.. 12(3).1 indexed citations
9.
Willinsky, John. (2005). The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship (Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing). The MIT Press eBooks.18 indexed citations
10.
Willinsky, John. (2005). Keep the Whole World at Your Fingertips: Education, Globalization and the Nation.. Education Canada. 45(1). 24–26.3 indexed citations
11.
Willinsky, John. (2003). Can A Portable, Open Source Journal Management/Publishing System Improve the Scholarly and Public Quality of Research? A Workshop. Elpub digital library.1 indexed citations
12.
Willinsky, John. (2000). Proposing a Knowledge Exchange Model for Scholarly Publishing. 3(6).15 indexed citations
13.
Willinsky, John, et al.. (1998). What Service-Learning Can Learn from Situated Learning.. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 5(1). 22–31.21 indexed citations
14.
Willinsky, John. (1991). The triumph of literature/the fate of literacy : English in the secondary school curriculum. Teachers College Press eBooks.16 indexed citations
15.
Willinsky, John. (1990). Intellectual Property Rights and Responsibilities: The State and the Text.. 24. 68–82.4 indexed citations
Willinsky, John. (1985). From Feminist Literary Criticism Certain Classroom Splendours.. English quarterly. 18(3). 35–43.
20.
Willinsky, John. (1984). LANGUAGE IN TWO STREAMS: THE MORAL DISTINCTION IN HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill. 19(3).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.