Martha J. Kurtz

557 total citations
9 papers, 404 citations indexed

About

Martha J. Kurtz is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Martha J. Kurtz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 404 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Education, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 1 paper in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Martha J. Kurtz's work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers). Martha J. Kurtz is often cited by papers focused on Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers). Martha J. Kurtz collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Martha J. Kurtz's co-authors include Ian J. Quitadamo, James P. Birk, J.E. Johnson, Celia Faiola, Carin Thomas and Julien Broisin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Chemical Education, CBE—Life Sciences Education and International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

In The Last Decade

Martha J. Kurtz

8 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Martha J. Kurtz United States	7	338	136	61	24	20	9	404
Abdi-Rizak M. Warfa United States	11	302 0.9×	143 1.1×	45 0.7×	11 0.5×	10 0.5×	12	376
Christopher Thaiss United States	7	242 0.7×	111 0.8×	22 0.4×	7 0.3×	16 0.8×	11	348
Lindsay B. Wheeler United States	13	376 1.1×	97 0.7×	46 0.8×	9 0.4×	10 0.5×	39	437
Lydia T. Tien United States	5	371 1.1×	184 1.4×	79 1.3×	10 0.4×	19 0.9×	8	425
Vicki Roth United States	9	427 1.3×	236 1.7×	50 0.8×	11 0.5×	24 1.2×	10	538
Ataman Karaçöp Türkiye	9	295 0.9×	129 0.9×	21 0.3×	9 0.4×	56 2.8×	29	361
Kameryn Denaro United States	9	187 0.6×	47 0.3×	12 0.2×	7 0.3×	20 1.0×	28	256
Wenliang He United States	9	323 1.0×	71 0.5×	32 0.5×	14 0.6×	80 4.0×	10	385
Hülya Demircioğlu Türkiye	9	355 1.1×	119 0.9×	60 1.0×	3 0.1×	20 1.0×	27	393
Anne O’Dwyer Ireland	12	215 0.6×	82 0.6×	49 0.8×	2 0.1×	18 0.9×	25	335

Countries citing papers authored by Martha J. Kurtz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martha J. Kurtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martha J. Kurtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martha J. Kurtz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martha J. Kurtz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martha J. Kurtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martha J. Kurtz. The network helps show where Martha J. Kurtz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martha J. Kurtz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martha J. Kurtz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martha J. Kurtz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martha J. Kurtz. Martha J. Kurtz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Kurtz, Martha J., et al.. (2025). Collaboration in virtual and remote laboratories for education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 20(4). 549–603.

Kurtz, Martha J., et al.. (2015). Community-Based Inquiry in Allied Health Biochemistry Promotes Equity by Improving Critical Thinking for Women and Showing Promise for Increasing Content Gains for Ethnic Minority Students. Journal of Chemical Education. 92(5). 788–796. 26 indexed citations

Quitadamo, Ian J., et al.. (2011). Critical-Thinking Grudge Match: Biology vs. Chemistry--Examining Factors That Affect Thinking Skill in Nonmajors Science.. ScholarWorks (Central Washington University). 40(3). 19–25. 4 indexed citations

Quitadamo, Ian J., Celia Faiola, J.E. Johnson, & Martha J. Kurtz. (2008). Community-based Inquiry Improves Critical Thinking in General Education Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 7(3). 327–337. 76 indexed citations

Quitadamo, Ian J. & Martha J. Kurtz. (2007). Learning to Improve: Using Writing to Increase Critical Thinking Performance in General Education Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 6(2). 140–154. 175 indexed citations

Kurtz, Martha J., et al.. (2001). When a Hypothesis is NOT an Educated Guess.. Science and Children. 38(7). 18–20. 7 indexed citations

Kurtz, Martha J., et al.. (2001). Analysis of a Distance-Education Program in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 78(8). 1122–1122. 13 indexed citations

Birk, James P. & Martha J. Kurtz. (1999). Effect of Experience on Retention and Elimination of Misconceptions about Molecular Structure and Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(1). 124–124. 94 indexed citations

Birk, James P. & Martha J. Kurtz. (1996). Using Cooperative Learning Techniques to Train New Teaching Assistants. Journal of Chemical Education. 73(7). 615–615. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact