Marlene M. Hurley
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers)Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper)Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Marlene M. Hurley
9 papers receiving 571 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Education 525
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 376
- Literature and Literary Theory 109
- Language and Linguistics 62
- Sociology and Political Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by Marlene M. Hurley
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene M. Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene M. Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene M. Hurley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene M. Hurley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene M. Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene M. Hurley. The network helps show where Marlene M. Hurley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlene M. Hurley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlene M. Hurley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlene M. Hurley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlene M. Hurley. Marlene M. Hurley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | A Taste of Math & Science. | 1 |
| 5 | An Example of how Meeting Standards Biases Institutions Toward Traditional Assessment Methods: Pre-Service Science Teacher Education | 1 |
| 6 | The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysisbreakdown → | 526 |
| 7 | 115 | |
| 8 | Interdisciplinary mathematics and science: Characteristics, forms, and related effect sizes for student achievement and affective outcomes | 1 |
| 9 | Literacy in the National Science and Mathematics Standards: Communication and Reasoning. Report Series 3.14. | 3 |
| 10 | Methods of Measuring Affective Impacts from Integrating the Arts into Core Curricula. | 1 |
| 11 | 0 |
About Marlene M. Hurley
Marlene M. Hurley is a scholar working on Music, Museology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 11 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (376 citations), Education (525 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (109 citations). Marlene M. Hurley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Bangert‐Drowns, Barbara Wilkinson, Audrey B. Champagne and Vicky L. Kouba. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Educational Research, School Science and Mathematics and The American Biology Teacher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.