Mark H. Newton

557 citations
18 papers · 394 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark H. Newton

16 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Mark H. Newton
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 126
  • Education 289
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 89
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41
  • Geography, Planning and Development 19
Replace Michelle L. Klosterman with:
Michelle L. Klosterman United States
Andrew T. Kinslow United States
Sami Kahn United States
Aidin Amirshokoohi United States
Dina G. Markowitz United States
Deniz Sarıbaş Türkiye
Tezcan Kartal Türkiye
Linda L. Cronin‐Jones United States
Don Duggan-Haas United States
Özgül Yılmaz Tüzün Türkiye
Mark H. Newton relative to Michelle L. Klosterman United States Michelle L. Klosterman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Michelle L. Klosterman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark H. Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark H. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark H. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark H. Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark H. Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark H. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark H. Newton. The network helps show where Mark H. Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark H. Newton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark H. Newton Line = papers co-authored together Mark H. Newton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201879
2 202167
3 202063
4 201950
5 201747
6 201622
7 201722
8 202310
9 20208
10 20237
11 20247
12 20245
13 20203
14
Perspectives on Professional Development.
19802
15 20211
16 20241
17 20240
18 20250

About Mark H. Newton

Mark H. Newton is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 18 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (8 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (5 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers) and Geography Education and Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (126 citations), Education (289 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (89 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (41 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (19 citations). Mark H. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dana Lewis Zeidler, Benjamin C. Herman, Troy D. Sadler, David Cunningham Owens, Laura Zangori, Leonard A. Annetta, Denise M. Bressler, Sami Kahn, Joanne K. Olson and Michael P. Clough. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Science Teacher Education, Science & Education, International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Science Education and Technology and Research in Science Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact