Maria E. Parente

928 total citations
20 papers, 666 citations indexed

About

Maria E. Parente is a scholar working on Food Science, Sensory Systems and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Maria E. Parente has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 666 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Food Science, 6 papers in Sensory Systems and 5 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Maria E. Parente's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers). Maria E. Parente is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers). Maria E. Parente collaborates with scholars based in Uruguay, United States and Argentina. Maria E. Parente's co-authors include Gastón Ares, Joseph L. Mahoney, Alvaro F. Jimenez‐Kairuz, Francesca Russo, Joseph A. Durlak, Amy M. Bohnert, Adriana Gámbaro, Heather Lord, John C. Castura and Edward Zigler and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Community Psychology, Food Quality and Preference and AAPS PharmSciTech.

In The Last Decade

Maria E. Parente

19 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Maria E. Parente Uruguay 13 259 136 121 104 100 20 666
Isabel Solé Spain 16 913 3.5× 13 0.1× 372 3.1× 11 0.1× 304 3.0× 39 2.1k
Mi‐Hwa Park South Korea 15 84 0.3× 40 0.3× 263 2.2× 32 0.3× 6 0.1× 61 957
Ann Fullerton Denmark 18 37 0.1× 197 1.4× 88 0.7× 37 0.4× 349 3.5× 58 1.3k
Chao Hu China 14 42 0.2× 7 0.1× 15 0.1× 183 1.8× 5 0.1× 48 811
Richard Watkins United Kingdom 7 108 0.4× 22 0.2× 43 0.4× 11 0.1× 12 0.1× 25 927
Ruoxuan Li China 17 99 0.4× 21 0.2× 143 1.2× 192 1.8× 7 0.1× 47 675
Kexin Jiang China 17 132 0.5× 8 0.1× 82 0.7× 18 0.2× 8 0.1× 69 943
Sue James United Kingdom 13 272 1.1× 99 0.7× 177 1.5× 32 0.3× 19 643
Zongyu Liu China 14 12 0.0× 9 0.1× 11 0.1× 68 0.7× 34 0.3× 40 538

Countries citing papers authored by Maria E. Parente

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maria E. Parente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria E. Parente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria E. Parente more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maria E. Parente

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria E. Parente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria E. Parente. The network helps show where Maria E. Parente may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria E. Parente

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria E. Parente. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria E. Parente based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria E. Parente. Maria E. Parente is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2020). Preparation and evaluation of caffeine bioadhesive emulgels for cosmetic applications based on formulation design using QbD tools. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 42(6). 548–556. 12 indexed citations
2.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2020). Development of an emulgel for the treatment of rosacea using quality by design approach. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 46(2). 296–308. 21 indexed citations
3.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2017). Study of the Influence of Formulation Variables in Bioadhesive Emulgels Using Response Surface Methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech. 18(6). 2269–2278. 11 indexed citations
4.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2015). Dynamic sensory characterization of cosmetic creams during application using Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference. 45. 33–40. 45 indexed citations
5.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2015). Bioadhesive hydrogels for cosmetic applications. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 37(5). 511–518. 115 indexed citations
6.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2014). Screening of mucoadhesive vaginal gel formulations. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 50(4). 931–941. 27 indexed citations
7.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2014). Selection of fragrance for cosmetic cream containing olive oil.. PubMed. 65(3). 161–73. 4 indexed citations
8.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2013). Sensory characterization of virgin olive oil-based cosmetic creams.. PubMed. 64(5). 371–80. 2 indexed citations
9.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2012). Parental Knowledge as a Mediator of the Relation Between Adolescent Summer Care Arrangement Configurations and Adjustment the Following School Year. Applied Developmental Science. 16(2). 84–97. 6 indexed citations
10.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2012). Freshness evaluation of refreshing creams: influence of two types of peppermint oil and emulsion formulation.. PubMed. 62(6). 525–33. 5 indexed citations
11.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2011). EXTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING OF COMMERCIAL ANTIAGING CREAMS BASED ON CONSUMERS' RESPONSES TO A CHECK-ALL-THAT-APPLY QUESTION. Journal of Sensory Studies. 26(2). 158–166. 86 indexed citations
12.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2010). APPLICATION OF TWO CONSUMER PROFILING TECHNIQUES TO COSMETIC EMULSIONS. Journal of Sensory Studies. 25(5). 685–705. 41 indexed citations
13.
Durlak, Joseph A., Joseph L. Mahoney, Amy M. Bohnert, & Maria E. Parente. (2010). Developing and Improving After‐School Programs to Enhance Youth’s Personal Growth and Adjustment: A Special Issue of AJCP. American Journal of Community Psychology. 45(3-4). 285–293. 70 indexed citations
14.
Mahoney, Joseph L. & Maria E. Parente. (2009). Should We Care About Adolescents Who Care for Themselves? What We Have Learned and What We Need to Know About Youth in Self-Care. Child Development Perspectives. 3(3). 189–195. 18 indexed citations
15.
Mahoney, Joseph L., Maria E. Parente, & Edward Zigler. (2009). Afterschool Programs in America: Origins, Growth, Popularity, and Politics. Journal of Youth Development. 4(3). 23–42. 31 indexed citations
16.
Parente, Maria E. & Joseph L. Mahoney. (2009). Residential mobility and exposure to neighborhood crime: risks for young children's aggression. Journal of Community Psychology. 37(5). 559–578. 13 indexed citations
17.
Parente, Maria E., Adriana Gámbaro, & Gastón Ares. (2008). SENSORY CHARACTERIZATION OF EMOLLIENTS. Journal of Sensory Studies. 23(2). 149–161. 46 indexed citations
18.
Gámbaro, Adriana, Maria E. Parente, & Ana Giménez. (2007). Free-choice-profile descriptive analysis of sticks with conditioning agents.. PubMed. 57(6). 455–63. 1 indexed citations
19.
Mahoney, Joseph L., Maria E. Parente, & Heather Lord. (2007). After‐School Program Engagement: Links to Child Competence and Program Quality and Content. The Elementary School Journal. 107(4). 385–404. 48 indexed citations
20.
Parente, Maria E., et al.. (2005). Study of sensory properties of emollients used in cosmetics and their correlation with physicochemical properties. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 27(6). 354–354. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Isabel Solé Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mi‐Hwa Park Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann Fullerton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chao Hu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard Watkins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruoxuan Li Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kexin Jiang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sue James Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zongyu Liu
Rankless by CCL
2026