Child Development Perspectives

737 papers and 40.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 737 papers published in Child Development Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Child Development Perspectives usually cover Education (293 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (245 papers) and Clinical Psychology (217 papers) specifically the topics of Early Childhood Education and Development (223 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (163 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Child Development Perspectives are Jeffrey Jensen Arnett, Philip David Zelazo, Stephanie M. Carlson, Clancy Blair, Michael Pluess, Rand D. Conger, Susan Branje, Jeffrey Liew, Gary W. Evans and Pilyoung Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Child Development Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Child Development Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Child Development Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Child Development Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Child Development Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Child Development Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child Development Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026