Margaret Rutherford

769 total citations
10 papers, 496 citations indexed

About

Margaret Rutherford is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret Rutherford has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 496 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Margaret Rutherford's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers). Margaret Rutherford is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers). Margaret Rutherford collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Margaret Rutherford's co-authors include John K. Gilbert, Carolyn J. Boulter, Marissa Rollnick, M. B. Ormerod, Charles L. Wood, Julia B. Lewis, Ebele M. Umeukeje, Khaled Abdel-Kader, Kerri L. Cavanaugh and Consuelo H. Wilkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, International Journal of Science Education and Research in Science & Technological Education.

In The Last Decade

Margaret Rutherford

10 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Margaret Rutherford
Bing Wei Macao
Mehmet Aydeniz United States
E. David Wong United States
Iztok Devetak Slovenia
P. S. Freyberg New Zealand
Margaret Rutherford
Citations per year, relative to Margaret Rutherford Margaret Rutherford (= 1×) peers Malka Gorodetsky

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Rutherford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Rutherford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Rutherford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Rutherford. The network helps show where Margaret Rutherford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Rutherford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Rutherford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Rutherford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Rutherford. Margaret Rutherford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Umeukeje, Ebele M., Saugar Maripuri, Margaret Rutherford, et al.. (2018). Black Americans’ Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators of Community Screening for Kidney Disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 13(4). 551–559. 22 indexed citations
2.
Rutherford, Margaret, et al.. (2000). Language as a confounding variable in the diagnosis of misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education. 22(7). 703–717. 46 indexed citations
3.
Gilbert, John K., Carolyn J. Boulter, & Margaret Rutherford. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses?. International Journal of Science Education. 20(1). 83–97. 233 indexed citations
4.
Gilbert, John K., Carolyn J. Boulter, & Margaret Rutherford. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 2: Whose voice? Whose ears?. International Journal of Science Education. 20(2). 187–203. 88 indexed citations
5.
Rutherford, Margaret. (1997). Working memory revisited: can we use it to select science students?. International Journal of Science Education. 19(8). 939–955. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rollnick, Marissa & Margaret Rutherford. (1996). The use of mother tongue and English in the learning and expression of science concepts: a classroom‐based study. International Journal of Science Education. 18(1). 91–103. 35 indexed citations
7.
Rollnick, Marissa & Margaret Rutherford. (1993). The use of a conceptual change model and mixed language strategy for remediating misconceptions on air pressure. International Journal of Science Education. 15(4). 363–381. 24 indexed citations
8.
Rutherford, Margaret, et al.. (1990). A comparison of the recognition of some science concept definitions in English and North Sotho for second language English speakers. International Journal of Science Education. 12(4). 443–456. 17 indexed citations
9.
Rollnick, Marissa & Margaret Rutherford. (1990). African primary school teachers‐what ideas do they hold on air and air pressure?. International Journal of Science Education. 12(1). 101–113. 20 indexed citations
10.
Ormerod, M. B., Margaret Rutherford, & Charles L. Wood. (1989). Relationships between Attitudes to Science and Television Viewing among Pupils Aged 10 to 13 +. Research in Science & Technological Education. 7(1). 75–84. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026