Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Extending the UTAUT model to understand the customers’ acceptance and use of internet banking in Lebanon
This map shows the geographic impact of Maged Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maged Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maged Ali more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maged Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maged Ali. The network helps show where Maged Ali may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maged Ali
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maged Ali.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maged Ali based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maged Ali. Maged Ali is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haddara, Moutaz, et al.. (2018). Applications of Big Data Analytics in Financial Auditing- A Study on The Big Four. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.8 indexed citations
Ali, Maged, et al.. (2012). Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Technologies for Locating Warehouse Resources: A Conceptual Framework. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London). 1–20.1 indexed citations
9.
Elbardan, Hany & Maged Ali. (2011). ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION AND INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION CHANGE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 196.2 indexed citations
10.
El‐Haddadeh, Ramzi, Vishanth Weerakkody, Shafi Al‐Shafi, & Maged Ali. (2010). E-Government implementation Challenges: A Case study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 312.14 indexed citations
11.
Ali, Maged. (2010). Cultural Aspects of Multi-Channel Customer Management: A Case Study in Italy. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 81.2 indexed citations
Ali, Maged & Laurence Brooks. (2009). Cultual Aspects of Multi-Channel Customer Management: A UK Case Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 564.2 indexed citations
14.
Ali, Maged, Weerakkody, & Ramzi El‐Haddadeh. (2009). The impact of national culture on e-government implementation: A comparison case study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 137.26 indexed citations
15.
Patel, Nandish V., et al.. (2009). Assessing the Role of Knowledge Management Technologies in Learning Organisations.2 indexed citations
16.
Ali, Maged, Laurence Brooks, & Sarmad Alshawi. (2008). Culture and IS: A criticism of predefined cultural archetypes studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 62.15 indexed citations
Ali, Maged, Laurence Brooks, Sarmad Alshawi, & Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou. (2006). Cultural Dimensions and CRM Systems Implementation: A Preliminary Framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 174.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.