Francesco Moscone
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Demography top 1%
- Health top 2%
- Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Badi H. BaltagiElisa TosettiGiorgio VittadiniMartín KnappCarol JaggerClare GilliesWilma J. NusselderEmmanuelle Cambois
- Topics
- Global Health Care Issues (34 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (16 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Francesco Moscone
49 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- General Health Professions 1.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 857
- Demography 381
- Health 358
- Finance 194
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Moscone
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Moscone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Moscone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Moscone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Moscone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Moscone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Moscone. The network helps show where Francesco Moscone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Moscone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Moscone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Moscone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Moscone. Francesco Moscone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 95 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Social Interaction in Patients'Hospital Choice: Evidences from Italy | 2 |
| 16 | 103 | |
| 17 | 245 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | Wanless social care review: securing good care for older people, taking a long-term view | 29 |
| 20 | Exploring the spatial pattern of mental health expenditure. | 56 |
About Francesco Moscone
Francesco Moscone is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (34 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (16 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Health (358 citations) and Demography (381 citations). Francesco Moscone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Badi H. Baltagi, Elisa Tosetti, Giorgio Vittadini, Martín Knapp, Carol Jagger, Clare Gillies, Wilma J. Nusselder, Emmanuelle Cambois, Herman Van Oyen and Jean‐Marie Robine. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Social Science & Medicine and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.