M. Ena Inesi

2.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
15 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

M. Ena Inesi is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Ena Inesi has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in M. Ena Inesi's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). M. Ena Inesi is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). M. Ena Inesi collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. M. Ena Inesi's co-authors include Adam D. Galinsky, Deborah H. Gruenfeld, Joe C. Magee, Simona Botti, Gabrielle Adams, Derek D. Rucker, David Dubois, Daniel M. Cable, Kimberly Rios and Madan M. Pillutla and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science and The Leadership Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

M. Ena Inesi

15 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Power and Perspectives Not Taken

2006 830 citations Adam D. Galinsky, Joe C. Magee et al. Psychological Science profile →
Power and the objectification of social targets.

2008 549 citations Deborah H. Gruenfeld, M. Ena Inesi et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Ena Inesi United Kingdom	11	1.2k	1.0k	366	341	244	15	2.0k
Cynthia S. Wang United States	21	1.3k 1.1×	884 0.9×	303 0.8×	372 1.1×	220 0.9×	39	2.3k
Gillian Ku United Kingdom	17	997 0.9×	862 0.9×	277 0.8×	308 0.9×	223 0.9×	31	2.2k
Jennifer Whitson United States	16	1.5k 1.3×	1.1k 1.1×	258 0.7×	647 1.9×	255 1.0×	30	2.6k
Joris Lammers Germany	27	1.7k 1.5×	1.3k 1.3×	360 1.0×	560 1.6×	276 1.1×	74	2.8k
Gavin J. Kilduff United States	17	1.1k 1.0×	680 0.7×	485 1.3×	238 0.7×	251 1.0×	28	2.1k
Katie A. Liljenquist United States	10	809 0.7×	945 0.9×	241 0.7×	637 1.9×	372 1.5×	15	1.9k
Daan Scheepers Netherlands	25	1.5k 1.3×	1.2k 1.2×	279 0.8×	483 1.4×	255 1.0×	76	2.3k
Ana Guinote United Kingdom	23	1.6k 1.4×	1.4k 1.4×	302 0.8×	611 1.8×	280 1.1×	59	2.4k
Nir Halevy United States	23	1.4k 1.2×	921 0.9×	420 1.1×	314 0.9×	180 0.7×	58	2.2k
Annette Y. Lee-Chai United States	7	1.1k 0.9×	989 1.0×	216 0.6×	521 1.5×	365 1.5×	11	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Ena Inesi

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Ena Inesi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Ena Inesi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Ena Inesi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Ena Inesi

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Ena Inesi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Ena Inesi. The network helps show where M. Ena Inesi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Ena Inesi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Ena Inesi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Ena Inesi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Ena Inesi. M. Ena Inesi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Inesi, M. Ena & Kimberly Rios. (2023). How prosocial actors use power hierarchies to build moral reputation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 106. 104441–104441. 3 indexed citations

Inesi, M. Ena, Gabrielle Adams, & Anurag Gupta. (2021). When it pays to be kind: The allocation of indirect reciprocity within power hierarchies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 165. 115–126. 9 indexed citations

Inesi, M. Ena, et al.. (2020). The power of lost alternatives in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 162. 59–80. 2 indexed citations

Adams, Gabrielle & M. Ena Inesi. (2016). Impediments to forgiveness: Victim and transgressor attributions of intent and guilt.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 111(6). 866–881. 45 indexed citations

Adams, Gabrielle, Xi Zou, M. Ena Inesi, & Madan M. Pillutla. (2014). Forgiveness is not always divine: When expressing forgiveness makes others avoid you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 126. 130–141. 38 indexed citations

Inesi, M. Ena & Daniel M. Cable. (2014). When Accomplishments Come Back to Haunt You: The Negative Effect of Competence Signals on Women's Performance Evaluations. Personnel Psychology. 68(3). 615–657. 39 indexed citations

Inesi, M. Ena, Sun Young Lee, & Kimberly Rios. (2014). Objects of desire: Subordinate ingratiation triggers self-objectification among powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 53. 19–30. 19 indexed citations

Haselhuhn, Michael P., Elaine M. Wong, Margaret Ormiston, M. Ena Inesi, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2014). Negotiating face-to-face: Men's facial structure predicts negotiation performance. The Leadership Quarterly. 25(5). 835–845. 46 indexed citations

Inesi, M. Ena & Kimberly Rios. (2013). Fighting for independence: Significant others' goals for oneself incite reactance among the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49(6). 1168–1176. 11 indexed citations

10.

Inesi, M. Ena, Deborah H. Gruenfeld, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2012). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: FALLING OUT OF FAVOUR. Business Strategy Review. 23(2). 80–81. 1 indexed citations

11.

Inesi, M. Ena, Deborah H. Gruenfeld, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2012). How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others' generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48(4). 795–803. 105 indexed citations

12.

Inesi, M. Ena, Simona Botti, David Dubois, Derek D. Rucker, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2011). Power and Choice. Psychological Science. 22(8). 1042–1048. 174 indexed citations

13.

Inesi, M. Ena. (2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 112(1). 58–69. 124 indexed citations

14.

Gruenfeld, Deborah H., M. Ena Inesi, Joe C. Magee, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95(1). 111–127. 549 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Galinsky, Adam D., Joe C. Magee, M. Ena Inesi, & Deborah H. Gruenfeld. (2006). Power and Perspectives Not Taken. Psychological Science. 17(12). 1068–1074. 830 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact