Kimberly Rios

1.7k total citations
74 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Kimberly Rios is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kimberly Rios has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 45 papers in Social Psychology and 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kimberly Rios's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (58 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (35 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers). Kimberly Rios is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (58 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (35 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers). Kimberly Rios collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Kimberly Rios's co-authors include Nicholas Sosa, Kenneth G. DeMarree, Zhen Hadassah Cheng, Azim Shariff, M. Ena Inesi, S. Christian Wheeler, Houchao Lyu, Gang Du, Stacey R. Finkelstein and Dale T. Miller and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Scientific Reports and Journal of Business Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Kimberly Rios

70 papers receiving 977 citations

Peers

Kimberly Rios

SPS

HEALT

Scott Eidelman United States

Kathryn C. Oleson United States

Paul Hutchison United Kingdom

Toon Kuppens Netherlands

David C. Matz United States

Orsolya Hunyady United States

Roxane de la Sablonnière Canada

Justin Friesen Canada

Mauricio Carvallo United States

Andrew L. Stewart United States

Scott Eidelman United States

Kimberly Rios

734 ×1.0

SPS

516 ×1.2

78 ×0.5

HEALT

234 ×1.7

121 ×1.0

Citations per year, relative to Kimberly Rios Kimberly Rios (= 1×) peers Scott Eidelman

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Rios

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Rios's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Rios with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Rios more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Rios

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Rios. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Rios. The network helps show where Kimberly Rios may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly Rios

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly Rios. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly Rios based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly Rios. Kimberly Rios is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2025). Perceptions of Religious and non-Religious Doubters. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 36(1). 82–96.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2024). Jewish Americans’ identity salience and effects on attitudes toward diversity. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 21676–21676. 1 indexed citations

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2024). Implications of Including “Jewish” and “Middle Eastern” as Categories on U.S. Racial/Ethnic Demographic Surveys. 1 indexed citations

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2023). “You want to be politically correct”: Opposition to political correctness predicts less adherence to COVID‐19 guidelines in the US. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 53(8). 725–742. 2 indexed citations

Itzchakov, Guy, Harry T. Reis, & Kimberly Rios. (2023). Perceiving others as responsive lessens prejudice: The mediating roles of intellectual humility and attitude ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 110. 104554–104554. 5 indexed citations

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2023). How does exposure to masked individuals affect White Americans' attitudes toward Asian American and Pacific Islanders?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 17(9). 1 indexed citations

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2023). Distrusted disclosures: Deception drives anti-transgender but not anti-atheist prejudice. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 1006107–1006107. 6 indexed citations

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2021). Shared disadvantage as a determinant of the relationship between White Americans’ socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic prejudice. European Journal of Social Psychology. 51(6). 910–923. 3 indexed citations

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2019). Is science for atheists? Perceived threat to religious cultural authority explains U.S. Christians’ distrust in secularized science. Public Understanding of Science. 28(7). 740–758. 33 indexed citations

10.

Lyu, Houchao, Gang Du, & Kimberly Rios. (2019). The Relationship Between Future Time Perspective and Self-Esteem: A Cross-Cultural Study of Chinese and American College Students. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 1518–1518. 29 indexed citations

11.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2019). Predictors of anti-transgender attitudes: Identity-confusion and deception as aspects of distrust. Self and Identity. 20(4). 496–514. 12 indexed citations

12.

Sosa, Nicholas, et al.. (2019). Perceiving demographic diversity as a threat: Divergent effects of multiculturalism and polyculturalism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 23(7). 1014–1031. 24 indexed citations

13.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2017). Godless in essence? Psychological essentialism, theistic meta-beliefs, and anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences. 119. 35–45. 10 indexed citations

14.

Piazza, Jared, et al.. (2016). Belief in divine moral authority: Validation of a shortened scale with implications for social attitudes and moral cognition. Personality and Individual Differences. 94. 256–265. 19 indexed citations

15.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2016). Engaging with diversity: Framing multiculturalism as a learning opportunity reduces prejudice among high White American identifiers. European Journal of Social Psychology. 46(7). 854–865. 30 indexed citations

16.

DeMarree, Kenneth G., et al.. (2016). Wanting to Be Different Predicts Nonmotivated Change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 42(12). 1709–1722. 7 indexed citations

17.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2016). Judging the actions of “whistle-blowers” versus “leakers”: Labels influence perceptions of dissenters who expose group misconduct. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 19(5). 553–569. 13 indexed citations

18.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2016). How Do U.S. Christians and Atheists Stereotype One Another’s Moral Values?. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 26(4). 320–336. 21 indexed citations

19.

Rios, Kimberly. (2013). Right-wing authoritarianism predicts prejudice against “homosexuals” but not “gay men and lesbians”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49(6). 1177–1183. 44 indexed citations

20.

Rios, Kimberly, et al.. (2012). Pals in Power Armor: Attribution of Human-Like Emotions to Video Game Characters in an Ingroup/Outgroup Situation. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 15(8). 441–443. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact