Luke H. Cashen
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers)State Capitalism and Financial Governance (2 papers)Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatvia
In The Last Decade
Luke H. Cashen
8 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Strategy and Management 133
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 116
- Accounting 90
- Economics and Econometrics 66
- Management of Technology and Innovation 53
Countries citing papers authored by Luke H. Cashen
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke H. Cashen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke H. Cashen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke H. Cashen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke H. Cashen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke H. Cashen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke H. Cashen. The network helps show where Luke H. Cashen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke H. Cashen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke H. Cashen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke H. Cashen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke H. Cashen. Luke H. Cashen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Accountability at the Top: Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect | 1 |
| 2 | Board Leadership Structure under Fire: CEO Duality in the Post-Restructuring Period | 5 |
| 3 | Pressures for the Creation of a More Independent Board of Directors in the Post-Restructuring Period | 2 |
| 4 | Organizational Size and CEO Compensation:The Moderating Effect of Diversification in Downscoping Organizations | 21 |
| 5 | 119 | |
| 6 | 89 | |
| 7 | A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. | 148 |
| 8 | 1 |
About Luke H. Cashen
Luke H. Cashen is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (2 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (116 citations), Strategy and Management (133 citations) and Accounting (90 citations). Luke H. Cashen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Scott W. Geiger, Robin Cheramie and Michael C. Sturman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Research Methods and Journal of managerial issues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.