Lisa Neal
- Information Systems top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Ted SelkerClark N. QuinnJan Marco LeimeisterGitte LindgaardKate OakleyJenny PreeceHongtu ChenPatricia Flynn Weitzman
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (5 papers)Online and Blended Learning (5 papers)Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers)
- Journals
- Psychiatric BulletinAgeing InternationalSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Lisa Neal
40 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Information Systems 88
- Artificial Intelligence 59
- Computer Science Applications 56
- Education 51
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Neal
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Neal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Neal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Neal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Neal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Neal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Neal. The network helps show where Lisa Neal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Neal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Neal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Neal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Neal. Lisa Neal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Men of learning in Europe at the end of the Middle Ages | 4 |
| 12 | Asynchronous distance learning for corporate education: experiences with Lotus LearningSpace | 0 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Using multiple technologies for distance learning | 4 |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | Polyphonic Narrative in Early Modern France: A Question of Literary History | 0 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 39 |
About Lisa Neal
Lisa Neal is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Software and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 51 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (56 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (38 citations) and Software (18 citations). Lisa Neal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ted Selker, Clark N. Quinn, Jan Marco Leimeister, Gitte Lindgaard, Kate Oakley, Jenny Preece, Hongtu Chen, Patricia Flynn Weitzman, Judith Ramsay and Sue E. Levkoff. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Bulletin, Ageing International and Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.