Psychiatric Bulletin

4.5k papers and 27.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Psychiatric Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 27.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychiatric Bulletin usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.7k papers), General Health Professions (1.3k papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (696 papers) specifically the topics of Psychiatric care and mental health services (986 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (465 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (443 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychiatric Bulletin are R Baldwin, Graham Thornicroft, Rachel Jenkins, Nuri Gene‐Cos, George Szmukler, Frank Holloway, Carol Paton, David Taylor, David Kingdon and R. P. Snaith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychiatric Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychiatric Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychiatric Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Psychiatric Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychiatric Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychiatric Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychiatric Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025