Leonor Pais

1.6k total citations
67 papers, 691 citations indexed

About

Leonor Pais is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leonor Pais has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 691 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 17 papers in Strategy and Management and 13 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Leonor Pais's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (18 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (9 papers). Leonor Pais is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (18 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (9 papers). Leonor Pais collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Spain. Leonor Pais's co-authors include Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Tânia Ferraro, João Manuel Moreira, Lisete Mónico, Paulo Renato Lourenço, Paulo N. Lopes, Lucy L. Gilson, Rita Berger, Claudio Simón Hutz and Samuel Monteiro and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Leonor Pais

55 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Leonor Pais Portugal 16 245 234 139 134 127 67 691
Stefan Süß Germany 16 148 0.6× 333 1.4× 83 0.6× 158 1.2× 116 0.9× 63 693
Ann‐Louise Holten Denmark 12 242 1.0× 426 1.8× 125 0.9× 174 1.3× 143 1.1× 19 892
Susan G. Goldberg United States 6 108 0.4× 295 1.3× 114 0.8× 122 0.9× 125 1.0× 13 721
Guy Van Gyes Belgium 12 169 0.7× 417 1.8× 128 0.9× 141 1.1× 110 0.9× 63 740
Julia DiBenigno United States 8 108 0.4× 333 1.4× 97 0.7× 256 1.9× 96 0.8× 14 664
Markus G. Kittler United Kingdom 14 77 0.3× 227 1.0× 111 0.8× 130 1.0× 120 0.9× 33 652
Stan De Spiegelaere Belgium 12 135 0.6× 450 1.9× 132 0.9× 158 1.2× 135 1.1× 40 706
Steven L. McShane Canada 14 111 0.5× 342 1.5× 145 1.0× 126 0.9× 74 0.6× 33 809
Francine Schlosser Canada 17 184 0.8× 388 1.7× 122 0.9× 244 1.8× 79 0.6× 37 828
Bas Koene Netherlands 11 109 0.4× 337 1.4× 126 0.9× 113 0.8× 61 0.5× 31 622

Countries citing papers authored by Leonor Pais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonor Pais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonor Pais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonor Pais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonor Pais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonor Pais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonor Pais. The network helps show where Leonor Pais may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leonor Pais

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leonor Pais. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leonor Pais based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leonor Pais. Leonor Pais is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2025). Perceptions of artificial intelligence in academic teaching and research: a qualitative study from AI experts and professors’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 22(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Santos, Nuno Rebelo dos, et al.. (2024). Human Resource Management Practices and Decent Work in UN Global Compact: A Qualitative Analysis of Participants’ Reports. Social Sciences. 13(1). 56–56. 2 indexed citations
3.
Santos, Nuno Rebelo dos, et al.. (2024). Organizational Values-Based Interventions and Common Good: A Multiple Case Study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 61(4). 715–748.
4.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2024). Empowering Leadership in the Military: Pros and Cons. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(4). 346–369.
5.
Wells, John, et al.. (2024). Decent Work-Life-Flow and its Assessment. Language arts journal of Michigan.
6.
7.
Ferraro, Tânia, Leonor Pais, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, & Vicente Martínez‐Tur. (2023). The Decent Work Questionnaire: adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. 21(2). 167–193. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ferraro, Tânia, et al.. (2022). Decent Work and Burnout: A Profile Study With Academic Personnel. Psychological Reports. 127(1). 335–364. 12 indexed citations
9.
Salvador, Ana, et al.. (2022). Toxic Leadership and Empowering Leadership: Relations with Work Motivation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. Volume 15. 1885–1900. 10 indexed citations
10.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, João Manuel Moreira, & Leonor Pais. (2020). Decent Work, Work Motivation, Work Engagement and Burnout in Physicians. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 5(1-2). 13–35. 43 indexed citations
11.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2018). MOTIVAÇÃO, COMPROMETIMENTO E EXAUSTÃO NO TRABALHO: UMA ANÁLISE SOBRE O TRABALHADOR BANCÁRIO. Revista Alcance. 24(4(Out/Dez)). 535–535.
12.
Mónico, Lisete, et al.. (2018). Business ethics: a study of Portuguese social representation of business ethics. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 13(1). 85–85. 3 indexed citations
13.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, & João Manuel Moreira. (2017). Decent Work and Work Motivation in Lawyers: An empirical research. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho. 17(4). 192–200. 16 indexed citations
14.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, & João Manuel Moreira. (2017). Trabalho digno e motivação para o trabalho em advogados: uma pesquisa empírica. 17(4). 192–200. 5 indexed citations
15.
Franco, Mário & Leonor Pais. (2017). Exploring the advantages of using social network sites (SNSs) in dental medicine organisations. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 30(4). 385–396. 2 indexed citations
16.
Mónico, Lisete, et al.. (2016). Authentic Leadership Questionnaire: invariance between samples of Brazilian and Portuguese employees. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica. 29(1). 27 indexed citations
17.
Ferraro, Tânia, Leonor Pais, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, & João Manuel Moreira. (2016). The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers. International Labour Review. 157(2). 243–265. 62 indexed citations
18.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2013). A GESTÃO DE RECURSOS HUMANOS E A GESTÃO DO CONHECIMENTO: CONFLUÊNCIAS E INFLUÊNCIAS. Tourism & Management Studies. 2(2). 451–461. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2013). HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: CONFLUENCES AND INFLUENCES. Tourism & Management Studies. 451–461.
20.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2003). Gestão do conhecimento : Dos dados à informação e ao conhecimento. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stefan Süß Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann‐Louise Holten Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan G. Goldberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Guy Van Gyes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julia DiBenigno Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Markus G. Kittler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stan De Spiegelaere Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven L. McShane Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Francine Schlosser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bas Koene
Rankless by CCL
2026