Tânia Ferraro

828 total citations
18 papers, 311 citations indexed

About

Tânia Ferraro is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Tânia Ferraro has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 311 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Tânia Ferraro's work include Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers) and International Labor and Employment Law (7 papers). Tânia Ferraro is often cited by papers focused on Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers) and International Labor and Employment Law (7 papers). Tânia Ferraro collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Spain. Tânia Ferraro's co-authors include Leonor Pais, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, João Manuel Moreira, Lisete Mónico, Rita Berger, Clemens Sedmak, Salvatore Zappalà, Jacques Forest, Marylène Gagné and Vicente Martínez‐Tur and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Reports, International Journal of Selection and Assessment and International Labour Review.

In The Last Decade

Tânia Ferraro

16 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tânia Ferraro Portugal 10 188 120 80 58 47 18 311
Galia Cohen United States 6 63 0.3× 149 1.2× 93 1.2× 48 0.8× 40 0.9× 13 314
Alison Barnes Australia 11 85 0.5× 71 0.6× 149 1.9× 32 0.6× 56 1.2× 36 324
Jennifer Patricia Barbour Australia 7 92 0.5× 150 1.3× 55 0.7× 12 0.2× 68 1.4× 11 289
Norene Pupo Canada 8 145 0.8× 70 0.6× 207 2.6× 28 0.5× 25 0.5× 21 356
Ingalill Holmberg Sweden 9 57 0.3× 177 1.5× 47 0.6× 10 0.2× 55 1.2× 11 319
Christian Maravelias Sweden 9 65 0.3× 120 1.0× 77 1.0× 18 0.3× 12 0.3× 22 256
Gordon B. Cooke Canada 11 134 0.7× 71 0.6× 119 1.5× 10 0.2× 33 0.7× 25 267
Danièle Linhart France 11 85 0.5× 49 0.4× 240 3.0× 60 1.0× 11 0.2× 56 386
Peter Valet Germany 11 92 0.5× 64 0.5× 166 2.1× 51 0.9× 35 0.7× 27 302
Nicole Humphrey United States 8 48 0.3× 49 0.4× 146 1.8× 57 1.0× 18 0.4× 16 270

Countries citing papers authored by Tânia Ferraro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tânia Ferraro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tânia Ferraro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tânia Ferraro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tânia Ferraro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tânia Ferraro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tânia Ferraro. The network helps show where Tânia Ferraro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tânia Ferraro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tânia Ferraro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tânia Ferraro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tânia Ferraro. Tânia Ferraro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2024). The role of knowledge sharing in the achievement of the UN's 2030 Agenda sustainable development goals and sustainability: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 15(3). 263–293.
2.
Ferraro, Tânia, et al.. (2023). Decent work, positivity, and the satisfaction with life of Portuguese lawyers: An empirical study. Psicologia. 37(1). 64–80. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ferraro, Tânia, Leonor Pais, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, & Vicente Martínez‐Tur. (2023). The Decent Work Questionnaire: adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. 21(2). 167–193. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ferraro, Tânia, et al.. (2022). Decent Work and Burnout: A Profile Study With Academic Personnel. Psychological Reports. 127(1). 335–364. 12 indexed citations
5.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2022). The Perception of Business Ethics in the Public and Private Sectors: a Study of Portuguese Social Representations. Trends in Psychology. 31(4). 823–844. 1 indexed citations
6.
Santos, Nuno Rebelo dos, Lisete Mónico, Leonor Pais, et al.. (2022). The multidimensional work motivation scale: psychometric studies in Portugal and Brazil. Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. 20(2). 89–110. 7 indexed citations
7.
Ferraro, Tânia, et al.. (2021). Trabalho Digno, Satisfação Com o Trabalho e com a Vida em Administradores. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho. 21(3). 3 indexed citations
8.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, Salvatore Zappalà, & João Manuel Moreira. (2021). The Decent Work Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Italian version. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 29(2). 293–302. 10 indexed citations
9.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, João Manuel Moreira, & Leonor Pais. (2020). Decent Work, Work Motivation, Work Engagement and Burnout in Physicians. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 5(1-2). 13–35. 43 indexed citations
10.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2020). Correction to: Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 16(3). 941–942. 2 indexed citations
11.
Pais, Leonor, et al.. (2019). Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 16(3). 917–939. 32 indexed citations
12.
Ferraro, Tânia, João Manuel Moreira, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, & Clemens Sedmak. (2018). Decent work, work motivation and psychological capital: An empirical research. Work. 60(2). 339–354. 26 indexed citations
13.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, & João Manuel Moreira. (2017). Decent Work and Work Motivation in Lawyers: An empirical research. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho. 17(4). 192–200. 16 indexed citations
14.
Ferraro, Tânia, Leonor Pais, João Manuel Moreira, & Nuno Rebelo dos Santos. (2017). Decent Work and Work Motivation in Knowledge Workers: the Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 13(2). 501–523. 41 indexed citations
15.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, & João Manuel Moreira. (2017). Trabalho digno e motivação para o trabalho em advogados: uma pesquisa empírica. 17(4). 192–200. 5 indexed citations
16.
Ferraro, Tânia, Leonor Pais, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, & João Manuel Moreira. (2016). The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers. International Labour Review. 157(2). 243–265. 62 indexed citations
17.
Ferraro, Tânia, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Leonor Pais, & Lisete Mónico. (2016). Historical landmarks of decent work. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 2(1). 26 indexed citations
18.
Ferraro, Tânia, Leonor Pais, & Nuno Rebelo dos Santos. (2015). Decent work: An aim for all made by all. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). IV(3). 30–42. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Galia Cohen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alison Barnes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Patricia Barbour Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Norene Pupo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ingalill Holmberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christian Maravelias Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gordon B. Cooke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danièle Linhart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter Valet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicole Humphrey
Rankless by CCL
2026