Citations per year, relative to Leigh Wood Leigh Wood (= 1×)
peers
Peter Galbraith
Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Wood
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Wood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Wood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Wood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Wood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Wood. The network helps show where Leigh Wood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leigh Wood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leigh Wood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leigh Wood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Leigh Wood. Leigh Wood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Godfrey, Stephen J., et al.. (2012). Diagnostic tests in a first year Mathematics subject. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference). 24–30.3 indexed citations
4.
Kirkup, Les, et al.. (2012). Are you being serviced? Promoting quality service teaching. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 9.
Harding, Ansie, Dan Kaczynski, & Leigh Wood. (2012). Evaluation of blended learning: analysis of qualitative data. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 11. 56–62.44 indexed citations
7.
Handal, Boris, et al.. (2011). Students' expectations of teaching: the business, accounting and economics experience. ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame). 5(1). 1–17.10 indexed citations
Wood, Leigh, et al.. (2009). Peer tutoring in mathematics for university students. Mathematics and computer education. 43(1). 18–28.7 indexed citations
Dixon, Peter, Anne Daly, Marilyn Clark‐Murphy, et al.. (2009). Embedding Generic Skills Means Assessing Generic Skills. Research Bank (Australian Catholic University). 1. 321–330.5 indexed citations
14.
Wood, Leigh, et al.. (2009). Mathematical sciences in Australia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 40(1). 17–26.8 indexed citations
15.
Rowe, Anna, Leigh Wood, & Peter Petocz. (2008). Engaging students: student preferences for feedback. 1–10.10 indexed citations
16.
Wood, Leigh & Dan Kaczynski. (2007). University Students in USA and Australia: Anticipation and Reflection on the Transition to Work. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 15(2). 91–106.7 indexed citations
17.
Wood, Leigh & Ansie Harding. (2007). Can you show you are a good lecturer?. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 38(7). 939–947.11 indexed citations
18.
Wood, Leigh, et al.. (2003). Rationale for establishing collaborative learning methods in first year mathematics learning. 32. 47–56.1 indexed citations
19.
Reid, Anna, et al.. (2003). Mathematics students' conceptions of mathematics. OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney). 32. 163–172.5 indexed citations
20.
Wood, Leigh, et al.. (2002). Students' perceptions of difficulty in mathematical tasks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.