Lawrie Phipps
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 0.5%
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian KellyDavid SloanFraser HamiltonHelen PetrieDonna LanclosJane SealeRichard WatermeyerElaine K. Swift
- Topics
- Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (11 papers)Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (8 papers)Disability Education and Employment (6 papers)
- Journals
- NatureSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaResearch in Learning Technology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Lawrie Phipps
23 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 207
- Occupational Therapy 90
- Information Systems 84
- Computer Science Applications 77
- Safety Research 72
Countries citing papers authored by Lawrie Phipps
This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrie Phipps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrie Phipps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrie Phipps more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrie Phipps
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrie Phipps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrie Phipps. The network helps show where Lawrie Phipps may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lawrie Phipps
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lawrie Phipps. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lawrie Phipps based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lawrie Phipps. Lawrie Phipps is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | A contextual framework for standards | 3 |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | Towards a Pragmatic Framework for Accessible E-Learning | 3 |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | A Standards Framework For Digital Library Programmes | 4 |
| 17 | Developing and Publicising a Workable Accessibility Strategy | 3 |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | Ideology Or Pragmatism? Open Standards And Cultural Heritage Web Sites | 7 |
| 20 | Access all areas: disability, technology and learning | 51 |
About Lawrie Phipps
Lawrie Phipps is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Health Informatics and Occupational Therapy, having authored 25 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (11 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (8 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (207 citations), Occupational Therapy (90 citations) and Health Informatics (28 citations). Lawrie Phipps has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian Kelly, David Sloan, Fraser Hamilton, Helen Petrie, Donna Lanclos, Jane Seale, Richard Watermeyer, Elaine K. Swift, Cathryn Knight and Mark Childs. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Research in Learning Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.