L. D. Satterlee
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- G. A. MILLERHenry F. MarshallK. C. ChangPatricia Rayas‐DuarteJ. C. ACTONC. E. BodwellLaszlo HacklerG.W. FRONING
- Topics
- Phytase and its Applications (17 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (14 papers)Proteins in Food Systems (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
L. D. Satterlee
68 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Food Science 1.2k
- Plant Science 862
- Nutrition and Dietetics 826
- Animal Science and Zoology 721
- Molecular Biology 518
Countries citing papers authored by L. D. Satterlee
This map shows the geographic impact of L. D. Satterlee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. D. Satterlee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. D. Satterlee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. D. Satterlee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. D. Satterlee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. D. Satterlee. The network helps show where L. D. Satterlee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. D. Satterlee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. D. Satterlee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. D. Satterlee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. D. Satterlee. L. D. Satterlee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quality of spaghetti containing buckwheat, amaranth, and lupin flours | 154 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 67 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | A comparison of in vivo apparent protein digestibility in man and rat to in vitro protein digestibility as determined using human and rat pancreatins and commercially available proteases. | 13 |
| 11 | The DC-PER assay: a method for predicting protein quality solely from amino acid compositional data. | 20 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | A MULTIENZYME TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING PROTEIN DIGESTIBILITYbreakdown → | 823 |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | Extraction and nutritive quality of wheat protein concentrate | 107 |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About L. D. Satterlee
L. D. Satterlee is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytase and its Applications (17 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (14 papers) and Proteins in Food Systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (721 citations), Food Science (1.2k citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (826 citations). L. D. Satterlee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include G. A. MILLER, Henry F. Marshall, K. C. Chang, Patricia Rayas‐Duarte, J. C. ACTON, C. E. Bodwell, Laszlo Hackler, G.W. FRONING, Milford A. Hanna and N. Y. Zachariah. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal of Chromatography A and Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.