Kim Watty
- Education top 1%
- Accounting top 2%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jade McKayClive MorleyPaul De LangeMargaret JacksonBrendan O’ConnellChi BaikSophie ArkoudisBryan Howieson
- Topics
- Accounting Education and Careers (27 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (12 papers)Higher Education and Employability (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kim Watty
44 papers receiving 953 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Education 622
- Accounting 380
- Management of Technology and Innovation 184
- Political Science and International Relations 182
- Management Information Systems 171
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Watty
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Watty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Watty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Watty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Watty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Watty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Watty. The network helps show where Kim Watty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Watty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Watty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Watty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Watty. Kim Watty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Innovation in accounting education: Engaging with digital technologies that enhance student learning | 1 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | The professional accountant of the future: never mind the quality check the look! | 0 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Inclusive assessment : improving learning for all : a manual for improving assessment in accounting education | 13 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 70 |
About Kim Watty
Kim Watty is a scholar working on Accounting, Education and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting Education and Careers (27 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (12 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (380 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (184 citations) and Education (622 citations). Kim Watty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jade McKay, Clive Morley, Paul De Lange, Margaret Jackson, Brendan O’Connell, Chi Baik, Sophie Arkoudis, Bryan Howieson, Martin Davies and Josephine Lang. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Teaching in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.