John R. Tanner

1.2k total citations
49 papers, 941 citations indexed

About

John R. Tanner is a scholar working on Education, Management of Technology and Innovation and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, John R. Tanner has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 941 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Education, 14 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 11 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in John R. Tanner's work include Management and Marketing Education (13 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (9 papers) and Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers). John R. Tanner is often cited by papers focused on Management and Marketing Education (13 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (9 papers) and Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers). John R. Tanner collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. John R. Tanner's co-authors include Stanley J. Smits, Ephraim R. McLean, Stephen B. Knouse, Herman Manakyan, Michael W. Totaro, Linda Ellis Johnson, Chon‐Huat Goh, Clyde W. Holsapple, Patricia A. Lanier and Geoffrey T. Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Operations Management, Information & Management and Journal of Management Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

John R. Tanner

46 papers receiving 789 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John R. Tanner United States	16	370	190	186	131	129	49	941
Cathy Owens Swift United States	16	347 0.9×	139 0.7×	185 1.0×	53 0.4×	152 1.2×	30	1.3k
Margaret Healy Ireland	10	353 1.0×	208 1.1×	124 0.7×	43 0.3×	36 0.3×	32	752
Theresa B. Flaherty United States	13	225 0.6×	163 0.9×	168 0.9×	48 0.4×	33 0.3×	21	690
Denny E. McCorkle United States	16	218 0.6×	151 0.8×	304 1.6×	63 0.5×	26 0.2×	30	883
Lauren K. Wright United States	8	172 0.5×	307 1.6×	278 1.5×	43 0.3×	40 0.3×	10	818
Kim Watty Australia	19	622 1.7×	112 0.6×	184 1.0×	65 0.5×	171 1.3×	48	1.1k
Bernard Keys United States	12	231 0.6×	399 2.1×	229 1.2×	34 0.3×	82 0.6×	29	1.2k
Jeffrey W. Alstete United States	13	211 0.6×	165 0.9×	220 1.2×	47 0.4×	70 0.5×	48	689
Charles D. Pringle United States	10	159 0.4×	492 2.6×	297 1.6×	50 0.4×	86 0.7×	18	1.2k
Oscar W. DeShields United States	8	193 0.5×	407 2.1×	194 1.0×	41 0.3×	46 0.4×	13	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Tanner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Tanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Tanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Tanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Tanner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Tanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Tanner. The network helps show where John R. Tanner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Tanner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Tanner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Tanner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Tanner. John R. Tanner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tanner, John R.. (2011). Missing the Mark: What Test Scores Really Tell Us.. The School Administrator. 68(9). 12–16. 1 indexed citations

Tanner, John R., et al.. (2009). Business Faculty and Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 20(1). 29–40. 57 indexed citations

Lanier, Patricia A., et al.. (2009). A Comparison of Gender and Gender-Related Issues in the Business Disciplines. Public Personnel Management. 38(3). 51–70. 10 indexed citations

Tanner, John R., et al.. (2008). Have Basic Mathematical Skills Grown Obsolete In The Computer Age: Assessing Basic Mathematical Skills And Forecasting Performance In A Business Statistics Course. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC). 5(4). 4 indexed citations

Totaro, Michael W., et al.. (2005). Faculty Perceptions Of Distance Education Courses: A Survey. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC). 2(7). 14 indexed citations

Johnson, Linda Ellis, et al.. (2004). Surveying the Cites: A Ranking of Marketing Journals Using Citation Analysis. Marketing Education Review. 14(1). 45–59. 55 indexed citations

Lanier, Patricia A. & John R. Tanner. (1999). A Report on Gender and Gender-Related Issues in the Accounting Professoriate. Journal of Education for Business. 75(2). 76–82. 15 indexed citations

Manakyan, Herman, et al.. (1999). A Normalized Citation Analysis of Real Estate Journals. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Knouse, Stephen B., et al.. (1999). The Relation of College Internships, College Performance, and Subsequent Job Opportunity. Journal of Employment Counseling. 36(1). 35–43. 189 indexed citations

10.

Hamilton, J. Brooke, et al.. (1997). Ethical Questions regarding Joint Authorship: Business and Nonbusiness Faculty Perceptions on Noncontributing Authorship. Journal of Education for Business. 72(6). 325–330. 14 indexed citations

11.

Manakyan, Herman, et al.. (1996). The Ranking of Real Estate Journals: A Citation Analysis Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations

12.

Hamilton, J. Brooke, et al.. (1996). Professional Standards for Joint Authorship and the Assigning of Credit for Joint Publications. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 5(3). 37–72. 1 indexed citations

13.

McLean, Ephraim R., Stanley J. Smits, & John R. Tanner. (1996). The importance of salary on job and career attitudes of information systems professionals. Information & Management. 30(6). 291–299. 41 indexed citations

14.

Tanner, John R., et al.. (1996). Employment of Recent University Business Graduates: Do Age, Gender, and Minority Status Make a Difference?. Journal of Employment Counseling. 33(3). 121–129. 6 indexed citations

15.

Smits, Stanley J., John R. Tanner, & Ephraim R. McLean. (1995). Herzberg revisited. 92–102. 3 indexed citations

16.

Strutton, David & John R. Tanner. (1994). Older Consumers' Perceptions of Health Care Information Sources. Health Marketing Quarterly. 11(3-4). 175–200. 3 indexed citations

17.

Smits, Stanley J., Ephraim R. McLean, & John R. Tanner. (1993). Managing High-Achieving Information Systems Professionals. Journal of Management Information Systems. 9(4). 103–120. 72 indexed citations

18.

McLean, Ephraim R., et al.. (1993). The structure of job attitudes among entry-level I/S professionals. 27–36. 12 indexed citations

19.

Tanner, John R., et al.. (1992). Management-Faculty Research Productivity and Perceived Teaching Effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business. 67(5). 261–265. 15 indexed citations

20.

Smits, Stanley J., Ephraim R. McLean, & John R. Tanner. (1992). Managing high achieving information systems professionals. 314–327. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact