Kim Stroet

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
12 papers, 670 citations indexed

About

Kim Stroet is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Stroet has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 670 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Social Psychology, 7 papers in Safety Research and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kim Stroet's work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (7 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers). Kim Stroet is often cited by papers focused on Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (7 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers). Kim Stroet collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, New Zealand and Belgium. Kim Stroet's co-authors include Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, Alexander Minnaert, Lisette Hornstra, Ridwan Maulana, Roel Bosker, Annaline Flint, Christine M. Rubie‐Davies, Barbara Flunger, Arnout Koornneef and Emilie J. Prast and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Youth and Adolescence and Educational Psychology Review.

In The Last Decade

Kim Stroet

12 papers receiving 641 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature

2012 299 citations Kim Stroet, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker et al. Educational Research Review profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kim Stroet Netherlands	9	380	340	199	176	127	12	670
Camille A. Farrington United States	7	228 0.6×	451 1.3×	159 0.8×	165 0.9×	103 0.8×	15	681
Keith D. Ciani United States	10	425 1.1×	294 0.9×	313 1.6×	142 0.8×	119 0.9×	11	694
Amélie Roy Canada	5	258 0.7×	325 1.0×	193 1.0×	83 0.5×	93 0.7×	5	554
Kristy A. Robinson Canada	15	275 0.7×	336 1.0×	365 1.8×	223 1.3×	128 1.0×	38	688
Jasmine Green Australia	5	249 0.7×	333 1.0×	229 1.2×	104 0.6×	93 0.7×	8	578
Anna Tapola Finland	12	263 0.7×	253 0.7×	307 1.5×	60 0.3×	154 1.2×	30	573
Virginie Hospel Belgium	8	233 0.6×	255 0.8×	101 0.5×	83 0.5×	82 0.6×	14	463
Valeria Negovan Romania	8	203 0.5×	392 1.2×	107 0.5×	98 0.6×	105 0.8×	21	636
Brigitte Maria Brisson Germany	8	247 0.7×	288 0.8×	335 1.7×	77 0.4×	106 0.8×	10	562

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Stroet

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Stroet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Stroet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Stroet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Stroet

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Stroet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Stroet. The network helps show where Kim Stroet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Stroet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Stroet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Stroet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Stroet. Kim Stroet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

Hornstra, Lisette, Kim Stroet, Christine M. Rubie‐Davies, & Annaline Flint. (2023). Teacher Expectations and Self-Determination Theory: Considering Convergence and Divergence of Theories. Educational Psychology Review. 35(3). 13 indexed citations

Flunger, Barbara, et al.. (2023). Differences in need-supportive teaching toward students from different socioeconomic backgrounds and the role of teachers’ attitudes. Social Psychology of Education. 27(3). 955–1005. 7 indexed citations

Prast, Emilie J., Kim Stroet, Arnout Koornneef, & Tom F. Wilderjans. (2023). What do students think about differentiation and within-class achievement grouping?. Frontline Learning Research. 11(1). 57–93. 2 indexed citations

Hornstra, Lisette, et al.. (2020). Profiles of teachers’ need-support: How do autonomy support, structure, and involvement cohere and predict motivation and learning outcomes?. Teaching and Teacher Education. 99. 103257–103257. 56 indexed citations

Hornstra, Lisette, et al.. (2018). Teacher expectation effects on need-supportive teaching, student motivation, and engagement: a self-determination perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation. 24(3-5). 324–345. 48 indexed citations

Stroet, Kim, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, & Alexander Minnaert. (2015). What motivates early adolescents for school? A longitudinal analysis of associations between observed teaching and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 42. 129–140. 64 indexed citations

Stroet, Kim, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, & Alexander Minnaert. (2015). Need supportive teaching in practice: a narrative analysis in schools with contrasting educational approaches. Social Psychology of Education. 18(3). 585–613. 42 indexed citations

Stroet, Kim, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, & Alexander Minnaert. (2014). Fostering early adolescents’ motivation: a longitudinal study into the effectiveness of social constructivist, traditional and combined schools for prevocational education. Educational Psychology. 36(1). 1–25. 21 indexed citations

Stroet, Kim. (2014). Studying motivation in classrooms: effects of teaching practices on early adolescents' motivation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations

10.

Maulana, Ridwan, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, Kim Stroet, & Roel Bosker. (2013). Changes in Teachers’ Involvement Versus Rejection and Links with Academic Motivation During the First Year of Secondary Education: A Multilevel Growth Curve Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 42(9). 1348–1371. 76 indexed citations

11.

Stroet, Kim, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, & Alexander Minnaert. (2012). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review. 9. 65–87. 299 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Maulana, Ridwan, Marie‐Christine Opdenakker, Kim Stroet, & Roel Bosker. (2012). Observed lesson structure during the first year of secondary education: Exploration of change and link with academic engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education. 28(6). 835–850. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact